From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932146AbZEHKIK (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:08:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752278AbZEHKH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:07:56 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.12]:36587 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE003.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831AbZEHKHz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:07:55 -0400 X-BigFish: VPS-25(zz1432R98dR1805M936fJzz1202hzzz32i6bh6di) X-FB-SS: 5, X-WSS-ID: 0KJBLGS-02-HU6-01 Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 12:07:38 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ingo Molnar CC: Andrew Morton , greg@kroah.com, norsk5@yahoo.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, mchehab@redhat.com, aris@redhat.com, edt@aei.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21 v3] amd64_edac: EDAC module for AMD64 Message-ID: <20090508100738.GA21064@aftab> References: <1241704183-29223-1-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> <20090507142724.GM481@elte.hu> <20090507143807.GA15923@aftab> <20090507135227.abbbc7dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090507211859.GA28770@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090507211859.GA28770@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2009 10:07:42.0177 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3442D10:01C9CFC4] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:18:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:38:07 +0200 > > Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Regarding workflow, the arch/x86 bits look good to me now, so you've > > > > got my Acked-by for that. > > > > > > Cool, thanks. > > > > > > Does that mean you're going to pick that one or... > > > > > > > Most of the EDAC patches are hosted in > > > > -mm, so we could carry them in the x86 tree separately as well and > > > > export it to linux-next so that -mm will have it automatically. > > > > > > is the bunch going through Andrew as a whole? > > > > > > > I could. But there's negligible overlap with other EDAC work so > > we might as well merge this via IngoTrees or directly from your > > tree. > > If Doug and you agrees too then i have no problem (at all) with > Borislav carrying these bits in a separate tree, as long as he also > opens an edac-next branch for linux-next and asks Stephen to pull > it, and keeps it an append-mostly tree that isnt rebased. I'll still need to rebase stuff to latest Linus tree for now since we're not yet ready reorganizing/cleaning up the code. After it gets merged, I'll switch to append-only mode. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München (OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632