public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mmotm] mm: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:38:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511133840.GA11624@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360905110421g1b079f2cr798ca95adfb8ee45@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:21:21PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:40 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 11 May 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hmm.. if __alloc_pages_may_oom fail to allocate free page due to order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTRY_ORDER,
> >>>
> >>> It will go to nopage label in __alloc_pages_slowpath.
> >>> Then it will show the page allocation failure warning and will return.
> >>> Retrying depends on caller.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Correct.
> >>
> >>> So, I think it won't loop forever.
> >>> Do I miss something ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> __GFP_NOFAIL allocations shouldn't fail, that's the point of the gfp flag.
> >> So failing without attempting to free some memory is the wrong thing to
> >> do.
> >
> > Thanks for quick reply.
> > I was confused by your description.
> > I thought you suggested we have to prevent loop forever.
> >
> >>
> >>> In addition, the OOM killer can help for getting the high order pages ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sure, if it selects a task that will free a lot of memory, which is it's
> >> goal.
> >>
> >
> > How do we know any task have a lot of memory ?
> > If we select wrong task and kill one ?
> >
> > I have a concern about innocent task.
> 
> Now, I look over __out_of_memory.
> For selecting better tasks in case of PAGE_ALLOC_COSTRY_ORDER, How
> about increasing score of task which have VM_HUGETLB vma in badness ?
> 

That is unjustified. It penalises a process even if it only allocated one
hugepage and it is not a reflection of how much memory the process is using
or how badly behaved it is.

Even worse, if the huge page was allocated from the static hugepage pool then
the hugepages are freed to the hugepage pool and not the page allocator when
the process is killed. This means that killing a process using hugepages
does not necessarily help applications requiring more memory unless they
also want hugepages. However, a hugepage allocation will not trigger the
OOM killer so killing processes using hugepages still does not help.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-09 22:46 [patch -mmotm] mm: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2009-05-10 23:42 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-11  7:29 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11  8:40   ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11  9:12     ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 11:21       ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 13:38         ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-05-11 14:00           ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 19:32             ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:48               ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 21:32             ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-11 23:41               ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-11 19:37   ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-12 12:42   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-12 13:05     ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 16:37       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-12 16:49         ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 17:35           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090511133840.GA11624@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox