From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: marc.c.dionne@gmail.com, eparis@redhat.com,
eparis@parisplace.org, hch@lst.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
serue@us.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, sukadev@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbacik@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for single andmultiple-instancemounts
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:40:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511154009.a6e10a0f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090511221502.GA32530@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:15:02 -0700
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Marc Dionne [marc.c.dionne@gmail.com] wrote:
> > On 05/07/2009 07:21 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >> Er. I meant add following lines after the memset().
> >>
> >> | opts->mode = DEVPTS_DEFAULT_MODE;
> >> | opts->ptmxmode = DEVPTS_DEFAULT_PTMX_MODE;
> >
> > Adding those two lines (with . instead of ->) does fix the issue for me,
> > thanks.
> >
> > | > Of course we would still need to understand if/
> > | > why this patch changes the settings.
> >
> > That particular patch changed things because the original memcpy in
> > new_pts_mount() did this:
> >
> > memcpy(&fsi->mount_opts, opts, sizeof(opts));
> >
> > where opts was a pointer, not a structure. So only the first few bytes of
> > the blank opts actually got copied over. The patch moved this memcpy to
> > devpts_get_sb() and in the process fixed the sizeof error.
>
> Here is a cleaner fix - When user space (/etc/rc.sysinit on RHEL5) mounts
> devpts, this problem might be masked since the mount system call could pass
> a non-NULL 'data' parmeter to devpts_get_sb().
>
> I tested this patch by directly calling the system call mount() with a NULL
> data parameter. If you/Eric/Peter can confirm that this works for you, I will
> send this patch to Andrew.
You already sent it ;)
> >From 2f7746f4df78ff57125c4714f0cd64e739ccf804 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:11:11 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] devpts: Correctly set default options
>
> devpts_get_sb() calls memset(0) to clear mount options and calls
> parse_mount_options() if user specified any mount options. The memset(0) is
> bogus since the 'mode' and 'ptmxmode' options are non-zero by default.
> parse_mount_options() restores options to default anyway and can properly deal
> with NULL mount options.
>
> So in devpts_get_sb() remove memset(0) and call parse_mount_options() even for
> NULL mount options.
>
> Bug reported by Eric Paris: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/7/448.
This patch fixes a post-2.6.29 regression, yes?
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@us.ibm.com)
Please use angled brackets around the email address. Some lame
person's scripts probably require it. <whistles innocently>
Under the he-merged-it-last rule, this patch should formally go via
Al's VFS tree. But I would happily accept a stfu-and-merge it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 18:08 [PATCH 0/5][v2] Simplify devpts code Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:10 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:17 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:11 ` [v3][PATCH 2/5] Parse mount options just once and copy them to super block Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:11 ` [v3][PATCH 3/5] Move common mknod_ptmx() calls into caller Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:12 ` [v3][PATCH 4/5] Remove get_init_pts_sb() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:12 ` [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for single and multiple-instance mounts Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-05-07 20:35 ` Eric Paris
2009-05-07 21:24 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-05-07 22:33 ` Eric Paris
2009-05-07 23:18 ` [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for single and multiple-instancemounts Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-05-07 23:21 ` [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for single andmultiple-instancemounts Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-05-08 13:53 ` Peter Staubach
2009-05-09 3:17 ` Marc Dionne
2009-05-11 22:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-05-11 22:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 22:37 ` [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for singleandmultiple-instancemounts Serge E. Hallyn
2009-05-11 22:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 22:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-11 23:09 ` [v3][PATCH 5/5] Merge code for single andmultiple-instancemounts Eric Paris
2009-05-11 23:00 ` Marc Dionne
2009-03-07 18:14 ` [v3][PATCH 2/5] Parse mount options just once and copy them to super block Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 18:16 ` [v3][PATCH 1/5] Unroll essentials of do_remount_sb() into devpts Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090511154009.a6e10a0f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.c.dionne@gmail.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox