From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758256AbZEKUGU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 16:06:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755588AbZEKUF6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 16:05:58 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:53163 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755492AbZEKUF5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 16:05:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ssl/5La8LlO7BHLKm8dVxcJxnf6p39zC4H2D3Cn9AXQWwokdOerqWJBmtq/sSXsld3 SC1YmmZGhOa0LYe6jf2y++b+F5XSNxCqpu3Zl1wzW9mlEU6ag15vzxZ2dKGPcZYK1gVB IdPfKXqL4EBeD3lu8h2DIB/cVz/h4nuCIDuRI= Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:56 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yinghai Lu , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, eswierk@aristanetworks.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: read apic ID in the !acpi_lapic case Message-ID: <20090511200556.GQ4624@lenovo> References: <49FC85A9.2070702@kernel.org> <20090511110234.GH4648@elte.hu> <20090511134140.GH4624@lenovo> <20090511134950.GA949@elte.hu> <4A0863C5.9070206@kernel.org> <20090511180521.GL4624@lenovo> <20090511200143.GJ28684@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090511200143.GJ28684@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Ingo Molnar - Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:01:43PM +0200] ... | | > Thanks Yinghai, looks really attractive! | > | > But would need a good testing (seems we | > rely on read_apic heavily in smp environment | > even if it was disabled or not supported). | > | > (btw comment about disable_apic now should | > contain apic->read as well or should be dropped | > completely since all is selfevidence from code | > though this is not that important i believe) | | Needs a delta patch against -tip - i got this stuff stable today but | i dont want to replace patches as it has a problematic track record | already. | | Ingo | Yinghai, could you make one? (i'm off for today, seems will be able tomorrow evening only) -- Cyrill