From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757366AbZELHEa (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 03:04:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753573AbZELHEV (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 03:04:21 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:55896 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753458AbZELHEU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 03:04:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:09:34 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: David Rientjes Cc: Jack Steiner , Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Message-ID: <20090512070934.GE19296@one.firstfloor.org> References: <4A05269D.8000701@kernel.org> <4A0527CB.4020807@kernel.org> <20090511175312.GA27905@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't know who has been pushing the memoryless node support, but it > appears as though it hasn't been fully tested yet. Yep. Every subsystem that accesses or specifies nodes directly would need to become aware of it. That is why I originally punted and just put these CPUs into nearby nodes. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.