public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:26:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3291 bytes --]

Hi,

>On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:16:14PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> 
> Hi Subrata,
> 
> > 
> > With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:
> 
> Patch looks good (you can add a 
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>)
> But I don't maintain this code anymore. Please resend to x86@kernel.org
> cc linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org for merge.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Andi


With gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090429 (prerelease), i get the following build warning:

CC      arch/x86/kernel/signal.o
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c: In function ‘sys_sigreturn’:
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:573: warning: ‘set.sig[1]’ may be used uninitialized in this function

On investigation i found that this is because of the evaluation
precedence of the expression below:

569 unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
570 {
571         struct sigframe __user *frame;
572         unsigned long ax;
573         sigset_t set;
574 
575         frame = (struct sigframe __user *)(regs->sp - 8);
576 
577         if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
578                 goto badframe;
579         if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
580                 && __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
581                                     sizeof(frame->extramask))))

The initialization for set.sig[1] may not occur if
	__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask)
evalutes to true. So, the compiler is complaining.

I have devised a small patch for this which wanes away this warning
without changing the conditional evaluation criteria. Let me know if
you like this patch.

582                 goto badframe;
583 
584         sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
585         spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
586         current->blocked = set;
587         recalc_sigpending();
588         spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
589 
590         if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->sc, &ax))
591                 goto badframe;
592         return ax;
593 
594 badframe:
595         signal_fault(regs, frame, "sigreturn");
596 
597         return 0;
598 }

Signed-Off-By: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
---

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c	2009-05-12 10:59:24.000000000 +0530
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c	2009-05-12 16:57:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -576,9 +576,10 @@ unsigned long sys_sigreturn(struct pt_re
 
 	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
 		goto badframe;
-	if (__get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask) || (_NSIG_WORDS > 1
-		&& __copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
-				    sizeof(frame->extramask))))
+
+        if ( (__copy_from_user(&set.sig[1], &frame->extramask,
+                sizeof(frame->extramask)) && _NSIG_WORDS > 1) || 
+                __get_user(set.sig[0], &frame->sc.oldmask))
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);

---
Regards--
Subrata


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-12 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12 15:56 Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-05-13  2:20 ` [PATCH] Fix Warnining in arch/x86/kernel/signal.c Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-13  9:06   ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-13 13:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-14  0:24         ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-14  6:30 Subrata Modak
2009-05-14  7:38 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-14  9:12 Subrata Modak
2009-05-15  2:57 ` [PATCH] " Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15  3:32 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-15 10:16   ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-18  3:36     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-05-18  6:38       ` Subrata Modak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090512155637.19380.9114.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox