From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msi-x: let drivers retry when not enough vectors
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:28:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090512212802.GC28935@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905080925.01398.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:25:00AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009 07:49:53 pm Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 May 2009 17:53:02 Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > Here's a good example. Let's suppose you have a driver which supports
> > > two different models of cards, one has 16 MSI-X interrupts, the other
> > > has 10. You can call pci_enable_msix() asking for 16 vectors. If your
> > > card is model A, you get 16 interrupts. If your card is model B, it says
> > > "you can have 10".
>
> Sheng is absolutely right, that's a horrid API.
>
> If it actually enabled that number and returned it, it might make sense (cf.
> write() returning less bytes than you give it). But overloading the return
> value to save an explicit call is just ugly; it's not worth saving a few lines
> of code at cost of making all the drivers subtle and tricksy.
>
> Fail with -ENOSPC or something.
>
> Rusty.
I do agree that returning a positive value from pci_enable_msix
it an ugly API (but note that this is the API that linux currently has).
Here's a wrapper that I ended up with in my driver:
static int enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
int *options, int noptions)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < noptions; ++i)
if (!pci_enable_msix(dev, entries, options[i]))
return options[i];
return -EBUSY;
}
This gets an array of options for # of vectors and tries them one after
the other until an option that the system can support is found.
On success, we get the # of vectors actually enabled, and
driver can then use them as it sees fit.
Is there interest in moving something like this to pci.h?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 8:28 [PATCH] msi-x: let drivers retry when not enough vectors Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 8:51 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 9:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 9:10 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 9:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 9:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07 9:40 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 9:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-07 10:19 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 10:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-07 23:55 ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-08 0:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-08 0:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-12 21:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-05-07 10:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-05-07 10:28 ` Sheng Yang
2009-05-07 10:44 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-07 11:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-06-11 18:28 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090512212802.GC28935@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox