From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760205AbZEMOm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 10:42:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755790AbZEMOmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 10:42:49 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:42275 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754718AbZEMOms (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 10:42:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:12:33 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Linux Kernel , Suresh B Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Dipankar Sarma , Vatsa , Gautham R Shenoy , Andi Kleen , Gregory Haskins , Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , Arun Bharadwaj Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpuevacuationsched_max_capacity_pct=n Message-ID: <20090513144233.GO13394@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090513130541.21440.33364.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com> <1242220497.26820.21.camel@twins> <20090513134556.GN13394@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1242222475.26820.22.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1242222475.26820.22.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra [2009-05-13 15:47:55]: > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:15 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > * Peter Zijlstra [2009-05-13 15:14:57]: > > > > > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:41 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > * Peter Zijlstra wanted more justifications for throttling at the core > > > > level. Throttling may be a resource management problem rather than > > > > scheduler/load balancer > > > > > > No, I mandate that it be thermal management. Any other reason and you've > > > got a NAK. > > > > We've been discussing hard limits from the resource management view > > point. Bharata is working on a RFC that we should be able to share > > soon > > Right, and you well know I dislike them. > Yes, but we hope to convince you with use cases and examples. -- Balbir