From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755759AbZENPBT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 11:01:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751600AbZENPBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 11:01:08 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:42152 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbZENPBH (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 11:01:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:06:32 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel , Suresh B Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Dipankar Sarma , Balbir Singh , Vatsa , Gautham R Shenoy , Gregory Haskins , Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , Arun Bharadwaj Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpu evacuation sched_max_capacity_pct=n Message-ID: <20090514150632.GG10933@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20090513130541.21440.33364.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com> <20090513143550.GU19296@one.firstfloor.org> <1242225402.26820.23.camel@twins> <20090513144659.GV19296@one.firstfloor.org> <1242226219.26820.26.camel@twins> <20090513150100.GW19296@one.firstfloor.org> <1242226927.26820.30.camel@twins> <20090513151054.GY19296@one.firstfloor.org> <20090514145045.GH4853@dirshya.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090514145045.GH4853@dirshya.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I think 'scheduler throttling' is good so that we avoid the term 'CPU > throttling' or core throttling. I had named this cpu evacuation or > core evacuation just to avoid confusion with hardware throttling. Evacuation sounds good, although shouldn't it be package or socket evacuation? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.