From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, arjan@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, jmorris@namei.org,
jbeulich@novell.com, peterm@redhat.com, gang.wei@intel.com,
shane.wang@intel.com, John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3][PATCH 2/2] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel support
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:52:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090514155204.GA6273@fancy-poultry.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090512210154.GC23773@mit.edu>
On 13.05.2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Ross Anderson was one of the first to write about these concerns, over
> five years ago:
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html
>
> It's interesting that his 2003 document was able to predict the
> emergence of the LaGrande Technology (see question 15 in the above
> FAQ).
Many thanks for pointing this out!
Strange enough, nobody seems to care. I have carefully read Ross Andersons
report, and I'm more than concerned now. Because I'm not a kernel
programmer, I can not see by myself what these patches will do to the Linux
kernel at all, so I can only hope that Linus will not let them in if they
can be misused to what Ross Anderson describes in his paper.
Regards,
Heinz.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 4:49 [RFC v3][PATCH 2/2] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel support Joseph Cihula
2009-05-08 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-29 1:02 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-05-08 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 5:26 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-05-12 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 9:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-12 21:01 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 15:52 ` Heinz Diehl [this message]
2009-05-15 0:17 ` James Morris
2009-05-15 1:45 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-05-15 1:51 ` Joe Perches
2009-05-15 2:49 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-05-28 1:12 ` James Morris
2009-05-15 12:07 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-15 12:26 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-24 19:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-24 19:42 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <E1M8kJQ-0000W3-TE@fencepost.gnu.org>
2009-05-26 2:31 ` Theodore Tso
[not found] ` <E1M9Mig-0003Q4-S1@fencepost.gnu.org>
2009-05-29 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-19 20:30 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-22 16:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090514155204.GA6273@fancy-poultry.org \
--to=htd@fancy-poultry.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=gnu@toad.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterm@redhat.com \
--cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox