linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, rpjday@crashcourse.ca,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove readq()/writeq() on 32-bit
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:19:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090514161903.4ba00c09.h.mitake@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0B6A96.2030008@garzik.org>

On Wed, 13 May 2009 20:49:26 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:

> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Judging from this thread and past, I think people will continue to 
> >> complain and get confused, even with the above.
> >>
> > 
> > Do you really think so?  Seems unfortunate, since an API rename would be
> > way more invasive.  This is the entirety of the header patch
> > (compile-tested using 32-bit allyesconfig).
> 
> The header patch does not lessen the confusion, because you cannot look 
> at the code and immediately tell what is going on...
> 
> Having a single function's behavior change based on #include selection 
> is /not/ intuitive at all, particularly for driver writers.  That is 
> unlike almost every other Linux API, where functions' behavior stays 
> constant across platforms, regardless of magic "under the hood."
> 
> That sort of trick is reserved for arch maintainers who know what they 
> are doing :)
> 
> 	Jeff
> 
> 
> 

I found another way:
Making architecture with atomic readq/writeq provide HAVE_READQ_ATOMIC/HAVE_WRITEQ_ATOMIC
and making architecture with non-atomic readq/writeq provide HAVE_READQ/HAVE_WRITEQ.
(HAVE_READQ_ATOMIC/HAVE_WRITEQ_ATOMIC should double as HAVE_READQ/HAVE_WRITEQ.)

So driver programmers who need atomic readq/writeq can judge existence of API they really need.
If platform doesn't provide atomic readq/writeq, drivers need these can be disabled by Kconfig.
And bugs Roland and David talking about will be banished.
How about this? > Roland and David
I wrote a test patch. Request for comments.

Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>

---
 arch/x86/Kconfig |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index df9e885..c94fc48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ config X86_64
 config X86
 	def_bool y
 	select HAVE_AOUT if X86_32
-	select HAVE_READQ
-	select HAVE_WRITEQ
 	select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
 	select HAVE_IDE
 	select HAVE_OPROFILE
@@ -2022,6 +2020,20 @@ config HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP
 	def_bool y
 	depends on X86_32
 
+config HAVE_READQ
+	def_bool y
+
+config HAVE_WRITEQ
+	def_bool y
+
+config HAVE_READQ_ATOMIC
+	def_bool y
+	depends on X86_64
+
+config HAVE_WRITEQ_ATOMIC
+	def_bool y
+	depends on X86_64
+
 source "net/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/Kconfig"
-- 
1.5.6.5


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-14  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-19 19:45 arch/x86/Kconfig selects invalid HAVE_READQ, HAVE_WRITEQ vars Robert P. J. Day
2009-04-19 21:12 ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-19 21:46   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-19 22:02     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-19 22:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20  0:56         ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-20  2:08           ` Robert Hancock
2009-04-20  0:53     ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-20  1:20       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-20 10:53         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 14:47           ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-04-20 16:03             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21  8:33               ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-04-21  8:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21  8:57                   ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-04-21 15:44                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-21 17:07                   ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-21 17:19                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-21 17:23                       ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-21 19:09                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-21 21:11                           ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-21 21:16                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-22  0:31                               ` David Miller
2009-04-28 19:05                                 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove readq()/writeq() on 32-bit Roland Dreier
2009-04-29  5:12                                   ` David Miller
2009-04-29 11:56                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 12:10                                       ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-29 17:25                                         ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-29 19:59                                           ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-13  5:32                                             ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-05-13 20:19                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-13 22:39                                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-13 23:39                                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-14  0:49                                                     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-14  7:19                                                       ` Hitoshi Mitake [this message]
2009-05-15 23:44                                                         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-17  7:12                                                           ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-05-17  8:06                                                             ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-21 11:35                                                               ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-05-21 11:49                                                                 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-05-13 20:42                                               ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-13 21:05                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-13 21:30                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-13 21:31                                                     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-13 21:54                                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-13 22:06                                                 ` Roland Dreier
2009-05-13 22:29                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-29 17:21                                       ` Roland Dreier
2009-04-22  0:27                           ` arch/x86/Kconfig selects invalid HAVE_READQ, HAVE_WRITEQ vars David Miller
2009-04-22  0:25                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090514161903.4ba00c09.h.mitake@gmail.com \
    --to=h.mitake@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).