From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759554AbZENQu0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:50:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751159AbZENQuN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:50:13 -0400 Received: from plexity.net ([206.123.115.38]:52540 "EHLO plexity.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751101AbZENQuM (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:50:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:49:15 +0000 From: Deepak Saxena To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Alessandro Rubini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] psmouse: ESD workaround fix for OLPC XO touchpad Message-ID: <20090514164915.GA26267@plexity.net> Reply-To: dsaxena@plexity.net References: <20090514011603.GA12494@plexity.net> <20090514022126.GA9461@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090514022126.GA9461@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Organization: Plexity, LLC User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On May 13 2009, at 19:21, Dmitry Torokhov was caught saying: > Hi Deepak, > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:16:03AM +0000, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > This issue was found during testing back in 2007, before I > > was involved, and the fix has been carried in the OLPC tree > > since then. Not sure how this would affect other systems so > > wondering if we should wrap this specific check around > > '#ifdef OLPC'? > > > > *sigh* Why can't we just implement standard? our jobs as software engineers would be far far more boring in that case ;) -- In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask "why were their poets silent?" - Bertold Brecht