public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	stable@kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.29.2 - AGP doesn't work anymore on my nforce2
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:44:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090516164420.3319334c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241455252.29445.49.camel@thor.local>

On Mon, 04 May 2009 18:40:52 +0200 Michel D__nzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:23 +0200, Karsten Mehrhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 17:07:40 +0200, Michel D__nzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 08:31 +0200, Karsten Mehrhoff wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 04 May 2009 03:41:51 +0200, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:22:19PM +0800, kawime@gmx.de wrote:
> > >>>>> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:51:47 +0200
> > >>>>>> Karsten Mehrhoff wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1.]
> > >>>>>>> PROBLEM: No more agp card functionality with the patch 2.6.29.2 of
> > >>>>>> 'a/drivers/char/agp/generic.c'
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [2.]
> > >>>>>>> I compiled the kernel 2.6.29.2 with my .config of 2.6.29.1 and run
> > >>>>>> into problems with the speed of my ATI RADEON 9600 (rv350)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Is your problem speed issue ? ie just a slowdown ? Or does AGP stop
> > >>>>> working with this patch ? Slowdown is expected from this patch but
> > >>>>> it should hurt too much.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>                        2.6.29.1  | 2.6.29.2
> > >>>>                         --------  |  --------
> > >>>> glxgears             ~ 2900 FPS  |  ~ 75 FPS
> > >>>> glxgears -fullscreen ~  500 FPS  |  ~ 11 FPS
> > >>> Does this patch alone give so huge slowdown? From my little knowledge,
> > >>> xserver
> > >>> does agp pages allocation only at startup.
> > >>
> > >> I only reverted this patch in the source file  
> > >> (/drivers/char/agp/generic.c) and got back my old speed on 2.6.29.2.
> > >
> > > Is the DRI enabled in both cases? Compare the Xorg.0.log file and the
> > > output of
> > >
> > > dmesg|grep -e agp -e drm
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > *********************************
> > 2.6.29.2 (original) 
> > *********************************
> > 
> > $ dmesg|grep -e agp -e drm
> > $ dmesg|grep agp
> > [    0.861997] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> > [   10.893793] agpgart: Detected NVIDIA nForce2 chipset
> > [   10.939070] agpgart-nvidia 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe0000000
> 
> No drm lines?
> 
> 
> > $ glxinfo | grep direct
> > direct rendering: Yes
> 
> This is not a sufficient test anymore since swrast_dri.so is direct
> rendering but not hardware accelerated. Something like
> 
> glxinfo|grep render
> 
> can be used to verify both direct rendering and hardware acceleration
> (the latter but not the former is also possible with AIGLX).
> 
> 
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > For me it seems that agp failed to initialize because of the patch.
> 
> Indeed.
> 

Guys, can we rev this up again please?

AFAICT we have two problems and at least one of them is in 2.6.29.x and
is presumably headed into 2.6.30 as well.

a) 59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e made Karsten's AGP stop
   working.  This is very mysterious.

b) Someone, apparently karsten who has a mysterious gap in this
   thread (did someone go off-list) is apparently seeing a massive
   glxgears slowdown.  I don't know if that slowdown was attributed to
   the same commit.  Or is that the same bug?



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-16 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-30  8:51 PROBLEM: 2.6.29.2 - AGP doesn't work anymore on my nforce2 Karsten Mehrhoff
2009-05-01  0:59 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-01 12:08   ` Jerome Glisse
     [not found]     ` <55bc079c-5c3d-465a-be28-0e38c0b48b14@rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-05-04  1:41       ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-04  6:31         ` Karsten Mehrhoff
2009-05-04 15:07           ` Michel Dänzer
2009-05-04 16:23             ` Karsten Mehrhoff
2009-05-04 16:40               ` Michel Dänzer
2009-05-16 23:44                 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-18  1:50                   ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090516164420.3319334c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kawime@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox