From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@morethan.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: unresponsiveness on linux desktop during file copy
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:14:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905170814.52776.lkml@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090517045800.GA32723@localhost>
On Sat May 16 2009, you wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:30:28PM +0800, Satish Eerpini wrote:
> > > I've prepared a rolled up patch for you, run time tested. It should
> > > protect all of the above pages from being evicted by large file copies.
> > >
> > > The attached patch is for 2.6.29.
> >
> > I applied the patch , but the number don seem to show much difference
>
> The numbers listed in your email? No the most relevant numbers are
> memory and disk ones.
>
> For my part, the number of mapped pages keeps stable when there is an
> ongoing background file copy:
>
> % ls -l /b/sparse
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 98T 2009-04-29 22:38 /b/sparse
> % cp /b/sparse /dev/null&
> % for i in `seq 1 100`; do grep Mapped /proc/meminfo; sleep 1; done
> Mapped: 22764 kB
> Mapped: 22796 kB
> Mapped: 22756 kB
> Mapped: 22716 kB
> Mapped: 22800 kB
> Mapped: 22788 kB
> Mapped: 22804 kB
> Mapped: 22808 kB
> Mapped: 22748 kB
> Mapped: 22708 kB
> Mapped: 22916 kB
> Mapped: 22944 kB
> Mapped: 22944 kB
> Mapped: 22944 kB
> Mapped: 22944 kB
> Mapped: 22944 kB
> Mapped: 22832 kB
> Mapped: 22812 kB
> Mapped: 22812 kB
> Mapped: 22792 kB
> Mapped: 22772 kB
> Mapped: 22860 kB
> Mapped: 22860 kB
> Mapped: 22748 kB
> Mapped: 22808 kB
> Mapped: 22868 kB
> Mapped: 22956 kB
> Mapped: 22956 kB
> Mapped: 22832 kB
> Mapped: 22832 kB
> Mapped: 22980 kB
> Mapped: 22980 kB
> Mapped: 22980 kB
> Mapped: 22980 kB
> Mapped: 22872 kB
> Mapped: 22872 kB
> Mapped: 22900 kB
> Mapped: 22792 kB
> Mapped: 22920 kB
> Mapped: 22812 kB
> Mapped: 22812 kB
> Mapped: 22752 kB
> Mapped: 22864 kB
> Mapped: 22972 kB
> Mapped: 22860 kB
> Mapped: 22796 kB
> Mapped: 22900 kB
> Mapped: 22888 kB
> Mapped: 22888 kB
> Mapped: 22888 kB
> Mapped: 22764 kB
>
> > , following are the statistics with the patched kernel, could
> > something else be causing the huge iowait, :
> >
> > Linux 2.6.29 (satish) 05/17/2009
> >
> > 09:57:14 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
> > 09:57:18 AM all 12.93 0.00 10.25 33.44 0.00 43.38
> > 09:57:21 AM all 13.32 0.00 28.09 24.40 0.00 34.19
> > 09:57:24 AM all 10.79 0.00 4.76 75.56 0.00 8.89
> > 09:57:26 AM all 11.46 0.00 8.01 35.64 0.00 44.90
> > 09:57:30 AM all 11.68 0.00 8.88 35.05 0.00 44.39
> > Average: all 12.03 0.00 11.94 40.81 0.00 35.22
>
> The iowait is high. Do you have "iostat -x 5' numbers?
>
> > and
> >
> > hdparm -tT /dev/sda
> >
> > /dev/sda:
> > Timing cached reads: 1332 MB in 2.00 seconds = 666.35 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 24 MB in 3.32 seconds = 7.23 MB/sec
>
> That's pretty slow numbers. On my laptop:
>
> # hdparm -tT /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing cached reads: 10266 MB in 1.98 seconds = 5188.46 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 138 MB in 3.01 seconds = 45.90 MB/sec
>
I see (on 2.6.30-rc6, no patches):
# hdparm -tT /dev/sda (The internal, low-power, low performance hdd):
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 492 MB in 2.00 seconds = 245.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 74 MB in 3.05 seconds = 24.26 MB/sec
# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb (A Class-6, SDHC card):
/dev/sdb:
Timing cached reads: 472 MB in 2.01 seconds = 235.28 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 40 MB in 3.13 seconds = 12.79 MB/sec
And the only thing going on -
(once you deduct the effect of getting this output) - nothing:
top - 08:09:25 up 9 min, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.40, 0.25
Tasks: 86 total, 1 running, 85 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 2.9%us, 4.2%sy, 0.8%ni, 59.9%id, 32.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 447040k total, 242996k used, 204044k free, 73516k buffers
Swap: 2199324k total, 0k used, 2199324k free, 79868k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3359 root 20 0 2444 1048 824 R 3.8 0.2 0:00.04 top
3360 root 20 0 3376 888 744 S 1.9 0.2 0:00.01 less
1 root 20 0 3084 1884 564 S 0.0 0.4 0:01.59 init
2 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd
Mike
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-17 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-15 17:07 unresponsiveness on linux desktop during file copy Satish Eerpini
2009-05-15 17:12 ` Mark Knecht
[not found] ` <93655eb70905151024o634f8432j6c3db85df1f6ddfc@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5bdc1c8b0905151120p5aa58318t1765544fbbb695b2@mail.gmail.com>
2009-05-16 2:38 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-16 2:47 ` Mark Knecht
2009-05-16 3:12 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-16 3:37 ` Mark Knecht
2009-05-16 6:52 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-16 21:11 ` Mark Knecht
2009-05-17 8:54 ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-17 9:04 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 8:52 ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-15 18:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-05-15 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-16 16:03 ` Ray Lee
2009-05-16 17:38 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-17 1:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 1:27 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 2:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 4:30 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 4:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-17 4:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 6:18 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 9:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 12:01 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 12:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 12:27 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 12:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 13:03 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 13:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 13:43 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-17 13:14 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2009-05-16 2:28 ` Satish Eerpini
2009-05-16 14:25 ` Satish Eerpini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905170814.52776.lkml@morethan.org \
--to=lkml@morethan.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eerpini@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox