From: Martin Lottermoser <Martin.Lottermoser@t-online.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PATA DMA problem leading to kernel panic on reading movie DVDs
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:12:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090517091224.GA8280@wanza.invalid> (raw)
Hello,
newer versions of the Linux kernel overestimate my DVD drive's
DMA capabilities, leading either to DMA being disabled or a kernel
panic.
My setup is:
Motherboard: ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe
South bridge: ICH5R
IDE Interface Controller (PATA): Intel 82801EB/ER (PCI: 8086:24db)
DVD drive: Samsung SH-S202N, attached as hdc.
There is also an older CD writer (Lite-On LTR-52327S) attached as
hdd.
Operating system: Debian 5.0.0 with security updates
On upgrading from Debian 4.0 (Linux 2.6.18) to 5.0 (Linux 2.6.26) I
found that trying to play movie DVDs with vlc (VideoLAN media player)
led to DMA being disabled:
hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x40 { LastFailedSense=0x04 }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
<4 more identical groups of these messages>
hdc: DMA disabled
hdc: ide_intr: huh? expected NULL handler on exit
hdc: ATAPI reset complete
The resulting configuration is too slow to play movies. I booted the
older kernel and everything was fine.
I then tested various versions of the Linux kernel where I happened to
have the original sources. The most interesting results were:
2.6.22.9 works, no errors visible in syslog
2.6.23.14 works, but syslog shows an error (see below)
2.6.24.3 DMA disabled
2.6.29.3 Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt (ide_intr)
on trying to open the DVD with vlc
The error message with 2.6.23.14 was:
hdc: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
ide: failed opcode was: 0xec
This kernel as well as 2.6.22.9 also showed the following on booting:
hdc: host side 80-wire cable detection failed, limiting max speed to UDMA33
This is correct: the drive is only capable of Ultra DMA mode 2 33.3 MB/s
(see manufacturer's documentation) and is attached with a standard 40-wire
ATA cable (black connectors for master and slave).
This led me to inspect other boot messages. With 2.6.18.3 I found:
hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)
2.6.24.3 showed:
hdc: UDMA/66 mode selected
...
hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache
In contrast, the hdd drive shows up with "UDMA/33 mode selected" up to
and including 2.6.29.3.
I now use "hdparm -d1 -X udma2 /dev/hdc" with the Debian kernel 2.6.26
and the drive works as desired. However, when querying the drive's
capabilities with "hdparm -I", although the command terminates
successfully and without any error messages (it shows
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4
), on inspecting the syslog I find, on each invocation, a similar
error message as above with 2.6.23.14:
hdc: task_in_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: task_in_intr: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
ide: failed opcode was: 0xec
Interestingly enough, this happens also when calling "hdparm -I" on hdd.
There are also error messages
hdc: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: set_drive_speed_status: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
from the boot phase.
Therefore there is still something wrong. Any suggestions on what that
is and how to fix it? (Answers preferably through "Cc:", but I'll also
try and follow the thread through list archives.)
Martin Lottermoser
--
Martin Lottermoser Martin.Lottermoser at _REMOVE_t-online.de
Greifswaldstrasse 28
38124 Braunschweig http://home.vrweb.de/martin.lottermoser
Germany
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-17 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-17 9:12 Martin Lottermoser [this message]
2009-05-17 10:42 ` PATA DMA problem leading to kernel panic on reading movie DVDs Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 11:15 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-17 12:14 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-17 19:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 19:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 20:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 20:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 22:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-18 6:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-17 17:59 ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-17 19:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-17 20:18 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-18 16:40 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-18 19:12 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 15:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 18:29 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 19:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 21:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 21:12 ` Martin Lottermoser
2009-05-19 21:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090517091224.GA8280@wanza.invalid \
--to=martin.lottermoser@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).