From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753330AbZEQPUj (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 11:20:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751163AbZEQPUZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 11:20:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:38278 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbZEQPUY (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 11:20:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IH9Q9fjE/lSxSPph7IM8sDjrSMoaSxlzrebv0lNIyu8FoPeHktsgGogt3s19xSbKuD 59FzZQmMBy48u2CGlTKIAkVSTxNf8ySH67wXNBk9La6+sMjNILI+77m4sngMOt74Vj1k /RTMiTohGW4xn5eqvYlG0utV9UmhZ0ObJSQUo= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15 v2] ide-atapi: remove pc->buf and misc cleanups Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:12:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.30-rc3-00442-ga3668b0; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe References: <1242364293-29223-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200905162135.53084.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090517103343.GB27838@liondog.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20090517103343.GB27838@liondog.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905171512.50019.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 17 May 2009 12:33:43 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:35:52PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > [..] > > > > > Looking at creation dates I suspect that somewhere along the way > > > > something was rebased? > > > > > > > > One quick temporary solution would be to recreate bp/pc-remove-buf > > > > on top of tj/block-peek-fetch... > > > > > > will do that first thing in the morning and push it for merging. > > > > Cool, please also merge ide-tape DEBUG build fix while at it... > > I'd suggest we merge that one before 2.6.30 hits the stores :) since it > is trivial enough and I won't have to backport it. Here's a rediffed > version against your for-next branch: > > -- > > From: Mark de Wever > Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:29:28 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] ide-tape: fix debug call > > This error only occurs when IDETAPE_DEBUG_LOG is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Mark de Wever > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov applied