Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/stat: cleanups, latency

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:20:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here are two patches for the stat tracing. I would also like to do 
> > more work on the stat tracing to make it able to manage by itself 
> > the entries for the tracers, ie: the memory allocation, accesses, 
> > locking, releases, etc...
> > 
> > And the workqueue tracer would be a good base to work on it. Then 
> > Ingo, if you pull this, could you please also merge tracing/core 
> > into tracing/workqueue, so that I can continue the work with these 
> > patches and prepare pull requests against tracing/workqueue. It 
> > should be mergeable without conflicts, I just applied the raw 
> > patches from this pull-request into tracing/workqueue and it was 
> > fine.
> 
> sure, i've done that!
> 
> > The following changes since commit 5872144f64b34a5942f6b4acedc90b02de72c58b:
> >   Li Zefan (1):
> >         tracing/filters: fix off-by-one bug
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> > 	tracing/core
> > 
> > Frederic Weisbecker (2):
> >       tracing/stat: replace trace_stat_session by stat_session
> >       tracing/stat: replace linked list by an rbtree for sorting
> > 
> >  kernel/trace/trace_stat.c |  166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> Pulled, thanks Frederic.
> 
> Note, i've rebased this on top of the tracing/workqueues topic and 
> have merged both into tip:master. You can use tracing/stat as a Git 
> basis. (assuming it survives today's testing in -tip without 
> requiring a rebase)
> 
> 	Ingo



Ok, thanks!