From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756324AbZERPp1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 11:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753610AbZERPpT (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 11:45:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:56361 "EHLO mail-ew0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752863AbZERPpS (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 11:45:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=AzJSRY3n1UHElCMjPZUua50z8eZAfdBz8zAYZ1DIQCapcx0Y1f8tEvbYcDxJWVhoRT OMjYns6fLy5leQBBhyoF4NktjPrLH9wgGrlwZnvN8S3bFhHS5M1B8JR/z/7wZQphSQK1 UlXaf0DgULsZF0Prs1cLtNUxcl8/yYk8mC38U= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drivers/ide Convert printk(KERN_ to pr_( Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:48:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.30-rc3-00442-ga3668b0; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov References: <200905181612.43632.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1242661288.1572.82.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> In-Reply-To: <1242661288.1572.82.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905181748.41172.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 18 May 2009 17:41:28 Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:12 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Monday 18 May 2009 04:21:08 Joe Perches wrote: > > > Mostly mechanical conversion of printk's > > Hmm.. less mechanical conversion using also dev_*() macros where suitable > > would be much better... > > How's about fixing pr_devel() which currently doesn't seem to be used > > by anything inside kernel to not depend on DEBUG in separate pre-patch > > and then using it instead of pr_debug()? > > How about deferring the "printk(KERN_DEBUG" to something else > and doing the mechanical conversion to core as a first pass, > followed by core pr_ to dev_ where appropriate > as a second pass? Fine with me. > What do you think is appropriate for pr_ to dev_ > conversions? printk()s using drive->name or hwif->name Thanks, Bart