From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: "Wolfgang Mües" <wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: do propper retry managment in the block layer - rewritten
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:41:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090519084102.GA28564@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905190916.40596.wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de>
[CC'ing Nicolas as he's the at91 mci driver maintainer]
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:16:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Mües wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 schrieb Matt Fleming:
> > Ah, now I understand. I've also been contacted privately by someone
> > who says that they've been experiencing similar issues and that your
> > patch has fixed them. Clearly there are people out there with flaky
> > hardware ;-)
>
> Hmmm... Every hardware is flaky. Put a piece of hardware near your
> refrigerator or DECT base, and you will have EMP or HF problems.
> Or use your finger and generate ESD pulses.
>
> I am using a piezo where I have the GND pin connected to a wire to generate
> ESD pulses which have the same results as a 4 KV ESD generator:
>
> http://www.vega-direct.at/buffet/chafing_dish_mit_zubehoer/gasanzuender/index.hsp
>
> A software which do not behave gracefully in the presence of errors is not
> production quality for me.
>
Oh, wow. I didn't pick up on the fact that you were artificially
generating errors on the bus. I thought you'd seen this sort of
problem in production. I don't understand what sort of fault-tolerance
you expect the MMC/SD subsystem to provide.
I've heard from one person that an earlier version of this patch fixed
issues with their at91 controller. If othe people are experiencing
similar issues and this patch fixes it for them, then it definitely
lends some weight to it.
Nicolas, do you have an opinion on the patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-18 13:21 [PATCH] mmc_spi: do propper retry managment in the block layer - rewritten Wolfgang Mües
2009-05-18 15:20 ` Matt Fleming
2009-05-18 16:00 ` Wolfgang Mües
2009-05-18 20:33 ` Matt Fleming
2009-05-19 7:16 ` Wolfgang Mües
2009-05-19 8:41 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2009-05-19 9:16 ` Wolfgang Mües
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090519084102.GA28564@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox