From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755076AbZESPBG (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 11:01:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751780AbZESPAy (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 11:00:54 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60822 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266AbZESPAy (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 11:00:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:00:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Oberparleiter Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Huang Ying , Li Wei , Michael Ellerman , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Message-ID: <20090519150031.GA21271@elte.hu> References: <20090519142416.356254359@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090519142418.583158351@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090519142418.583158351@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Oberparleiter wrote: > +int __gcov_execve(const char *path, char *const argv[], char *const envp[]) > +{ > + return kernel_execve(path, argv, envp); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__gcov_execve); Looks weird, why is this needed? Ingo