From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, greg@kroah.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: norsk5@yahoo.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@redhat.com,
aris@redhat.com, edt@aei.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] x86: add methods for writing of an MSR on several CPUs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:24:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090519172449.GB18874@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242390153-24493-2-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Hi,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:22:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Add a struct representing a 64bit MSR pair consisting of a low and high
> register part.
>
> Also, rename msr-on-cpu.c to msr.c accordingly.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
> CC: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
here's an updated version of the patch fixing a linux-next allmodconfig build
issue.
Peter, let me know in case there are any objections.
Thanks.
--
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:20:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 01/22] x86: add methods for writing of an MSR on several CPUs
Add a struct representing a 64bit MSR pair consisting of a low and high
register part.
Also, rename msr-on-cpu.c to msr.c accordingly.
Finally, put the cpumask.h include in __KERNEL__ space and thus fix a
allmodconfig build failure in the headers_check target. Fix a bunch of
checkpatch issues, while at it.
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
CC: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 23 +++++++
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/msr-on-cpu.c | 97 ----------------------------
arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/msr.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 638bf62..e49c14e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -12,6 +12,17 @@
#include <asm/asm.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>
+#include <asm/cpumask.h>
+
+struct msr {
+ union {
+ struct {
+ u32 l;
+ u32 h;
+ };
+ u64 q;
+ };
+};
static inline unsigned long long native_read_tscp(unsigned int *aux)
{
@@ -216,6 +227,8 @@ do { \
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
+int rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
+int wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -229,6 +242,16 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
return 0;
}
+static inline int rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr **msrs)
+{
+ return rdmsr_on_cpu(msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
+}
+static inline int wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr **msrs)
+{
+ return wrmsr_on_cpu(msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
+}
static inline int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no,
u32 *l, u32 *h)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
index 55e11aa..f9d3563 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# Makefile for x86 specific library files.
#
-obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr-on-cpu.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr.o
lib-y := delay.o
lib-y += thunk_$(BITS).o
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr-on-cpu.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 321cf72..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/preempt.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
-
-struct msr_info {
- u32 msr_no;
- u32 l, h;
- int err;
-};
-
-static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rdmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- wrmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.l;
- *h = rv.h;
-
- return err;
-}
-
-int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.l = l;
- rv.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err;
-}
-
-/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
- may not actually exist. */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->l, &rv->h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.l;
- *h = rv.h;
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-
-int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.l = l;
- rv.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..774dc29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+struct msr_info {
+ u32 msr_no;
+ u32 l, h;
+ int err;
+};
+
+static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rdmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ wrmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.l;
+ *h = rv.h;
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.l = l;
+ rv.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
+
+/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 - success
+ * <0 - read failed on at least one CPU (latter in the mask)
+ */
+int rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int cpu, tmp, err = 0;
+ int off = cpumask_first(mask);
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ reg = &msrs[cpu - off];
+
+ tmp = rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, msr_no, ®->l, ®->h);
+ if (tmp)
+ err = tmp;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/*
+ * wrmsr of a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 - success
+ * <0 - write failed on at least one CPU (latter in the mask)
+ */
+int wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ struct msr reg;
+ int cpu, tmp, err = 0;
+ int off = cpumask_first(mask);
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ reg = msrs[cpu - off];
+
+ tmp = wrmsr_on_cpu(cpu, msr_no, reg.l, reg.h);
+ if (tmp)
+ err = tmp;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
+ may not actually exist. */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->l, &rv->h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.l;
+ *h = rv.h;
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.l = l;
+ rv.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
--
1.6.2.4
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-15 12:22 [RFC PATCH 00/21 v4] amd64_edac: EDAC module for AMD64 Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 01/22] x86: add methods for writing of an MSR on several CPUs Borislav Petkov
2009-05-19 17:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2009-05-20 5:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-20 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-21 14:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-21 14:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-21 16:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-21 17:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-22 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-22 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 11:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-25 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-25 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 02/22] edac: fold __func__ into edac_debug_printk Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 13:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 03/22] amd64_edac: add driver header Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 04/22] amd64_edac: add debugging/testing code Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 05/22] amd64_edac: add DRAM error injection logic using sysfs Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/22] amd64_edac: add MCA error types Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 07/22] amd64_edac: add memory scrubber interface Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 08/22] amd64_edac: add sys addr to memory controller mapping helpers Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 09/22] amd64_edac: add functionality to compute the DRAM hole Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 10/22] amd64_edac: add DRAM address type conversion facilities Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 11/22] amd64_edac: add helper to dump relevant registers Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 12/22] amd64_edac: assign DRAM chip select base and mask in a family-specific way Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 13/22] amd64_edac: add k8-specific methods Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 14/22] amd64_edac: add F10h-and-later methods-p1 Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 15/22] amd64_edac: add F10h-and-later methods-p2 Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 16/22] amd64_edac: add F10h-and-later methods-p3 Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 17/22] amd64_edac: add per-family descriptors Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 18/22] amd64_edac: add ECC chipkill syndrome mapping table Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 19/22] amd64_edac: add error decoding logic Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 20/22] amd64_edac: add EDAC core-related initializers Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 21/22] amd64_edac: add ECC reporting initializers Borislav Petkov
2009-05-15 12:22 ` [PATCH 22/22] amd64_edac: add module registration routines Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090519172449.GB18874@aftab \
--to=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=edt@aei.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox