From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755862AbZETBOS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 21:14:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755408AbZETBOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 21:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:35119 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755304AbZETBOE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2009 21:14:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=n8bUFBM9rdYheShvII9s0AmWlpfF3WJIgjXCbjCRGqN4Z9Qs+0xTK5FBTahZfQcVsl qVG6EXx2FXN40zb74WHJSL5T2hH4xZY2Ha3bM7+eQv2UDh7+75dfcUZktCwoT6HPvCje UXvAr34aN2+QWq519PlkqcOpA7A6a4V7EY/88= Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 03:14:01 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , rob Cc: Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Helge Deller , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Message-ID: <20090520011358.GH6066@nowhere> References: <_AjETDMbIoL.A.DcH.RYzDKB@chimera> <20090517133210.GB4640@nowhere> <20090517161916.GA2976@liondog.tnic> <200905181835.28803.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905181835.28803.bzolnier@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:35:28PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 17 May 2009 18:19:16 Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297 > > > > > Subject : kernel panic - not syncing : fatel exception in interupt > > > > > Submitter : rob > > > > > Date : 2009-05-12 19:34 (5 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124216126903309&w=4 > > > > > > > > tainted crash, but probably legit. It does show some badness in an > > > > old-IDE legacy codepath: > > > > > > > > [] error_code+0x65/0x6c > > > > [] do_page_fault+0x0/0x1e0 > > > > [] ide_complete_rq+0xf/0x3b > > > > [] cdrom_newpc_intr+0x64d/0x6cd > > > > [] cdrom_newpc_intr+0x0/0x6cd > > > > [] ide_intr+0x109/0x161 > > > > [] handle_IRQ_event+0x54/0xc7 > > > > [] handle_level_irq+0x4f/0x85 > > > > [] handle_irq+0x17/0x20 > > > > [] do_IRQ+0x2b/0x66 > > > > [] common_interupt+0x29/0x30 > > > > [] cmd40x_init+0x2ac/0x38d > > > > [] default_idle+0x25/0x38 > > > > [] cpu_idle+0x19/0x2d > > > > [] start_kernel+0x23f/0x242 > > > > > > > > report subject line is too unspecific, it should be changed to > > > > something like: > > > > > > > > legacy IDE cmd40x related bootup crash > > > > > > > > > It seems the crash has been rewritten by hand. I don't see > > > any cmd40x_init(), I guess it's about cmd640 chipset, then > > > cmd640x_init() > > Frederic, is the oops reproducible? Is 2.6.30-rc6 any better? > > Does it help if you disable CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640? > (this system doesn't have CMD640 chipset) Sorry, I'm not the author of this bug report and I don't have this hardware. I've just added you in Cc's :-) But I'm adding the bug reporter in Cc. Rob, could you test above Bartlomiej's suggestion? Thanks, Frederic.