public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
To: Marcin Krol <mrkafk@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: inotify limits - thousands (tens of thousands?) of watches
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:12:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905201112.24401.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A13CCE1.5000106@gmail.com>

On Wednesday 20 May 2009 10:26:57 Marcin Krol wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> First, apols for using up bandwidth, but I honestly found no other place
> where I can ask about this (and get meaningful reply).
>
> I'm not a kernel programmer, but I want to develop a program that would
> watch modifications in *all* user directories on a busy server using
> inotify.
>
> This is for high-availability purposes - events would be collected and
> once every several minutes changed dirs would be rsync'ed to failover
> server or smth like that would be done.
>
> As inotify watches particular directory and not its subdirs, I would
> have to watch all directories.
>
> This means I would have to create thousands or even tens of thousands of
> inotify watches.
>
> So my questions are:
>
> 1. is it safe? that is, will it not lock the kernel up, or cause
> excessive memory consumption?
>
> 2. is it economic in terms of CPU time and RAM? I have no idea how to
> even measure such a thing happening in the kernel..

Hi,

I don't know the specific answers apart my intuitive feeling, which is that it 
probably would cause excessive memory use and that it is not elegant at all.

What may be interesting to you is the notification "engine" rewrite Eric Paris 
is doing and new fanotify interface which will, hopefully, come soon on top 
of it. With fanotify you will be able to monitor all changes much more easily 
and efficiently.

Have a look at patch descriptions in:
http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/fsnotify/

Tvrtko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-20 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-20  9:26 inotify limits - thousands (tens of thousands?) of watches Marcin Krol
2009-05-20 10:04 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2009-05-20 10:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2009-05-20 11:22 ` Martin Steigerwald
2009-05-20 12:16   ` Marcin Krol
2009-05-20 12:48     ` Martin Steigerwald
2009-05-20 12:58     ` Martin Steigerwald
2009-05-20 13:58 ` hooanon05

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905201112.24401.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrkafk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox