public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce and use DO_ONCE statement expression macro
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:26:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090522052652.GX8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1242965306.git.joe@perches.com>

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 09:27:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> The printk_once macro in kernel.h is limited to printk
> 
> This generalizes the functionality of printk_once and
> allows statements like DO_ONCE(pr_info("foo\n"))
> and DO_ONCE(initialize(foo));

Sigh...  Please, don't do introduce new control structures without extremely
good reasons.

printk_once() has syntax of function call; it's far more tolerable for
casual reader (e.g. somebody looking through the code while trying to
localize a bug) since it doesn't interrupt the flow - it parses as
"some function call, apparently doing some debugging output, let's see
if there are any obvious side effects in the arguments and move on".
Your DO_ONCE(....) parses as "what the fuck is that?" followed by
grepping for definition, and the cost is much higher.

Don't do that.  Staying close to normal syntax is a very good thing;
preprocessor can be used in a lot of ways that are harmful and introduction
of (effectively) new kinds of statements is a prime example.  It *does*
have its place, but it should be done very sparingly.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-22  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-22  4:27 [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce and use DO_ONCE statement expression macro Joe Perches
2009-05-22  4:27 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.h: Add " Joe Perches
2009-05-22  4:27 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: Use DO_ONCE & spelling fix Joe Perches
2009-05-22  4:27 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] kernel.h: Remove unused printk_once Joe Perches
2009-05-22  5:26 ` Al Viro [this message]
2009-05-22  5:39   ` [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce and use DO_ONCE statement expression macro Joe Perches
2009-05-22  7:01     ` Al Viro
2009-05-22  7:44       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090522052652.GX8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox