From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI Hotplug: acpiphp: don't store a pci_dev in acpiphp_func
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:36:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090522113622.GA14692@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521222115.GC8792@ldl.fc.hp.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 04:21:15PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> In other words, if acpiphp has claimed a PCI device, and that
> device is logically removed, then acpiphp may oops when it
> attempts to access it again.
>
> # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/$device/remove
> # echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/$slot/power
>
> The root cause of this oops is that the logical remove ("echo 1 >
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/$device/remove") destroyed the pci_dev. The
> pci_dev struct itself wasn't deallocated because acpiphp kept a
> reference, but some of its fields became invalid.
>
> acpiphp doesn't have any real reason to keep a pointer to a
> pci_dev around. It can always derive it using pci_get_slot().
>
> If a logical remove destroys the pci_dev, acpiphp won't find it
> and is thus prevented from causing mischief.
>
> Reported-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
I think this is the right approach. The more minimal way to fix this
would be to check that the pdev was valid before destroying it ... but
I approve of deleting more code from acpiphp ;-) You do end up doing
slightly more work in the remove case, but this is such an infrequent
operation that it really doesn't matter.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-22 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 22:21 [PATCH] PCI Hotplug: acpiphp: don't store a pci_dev in acpiphp_func Alex Chiang
2009-05-22 11:36 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-05-25 23:55 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-05-27 9:05 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090522113622.GA14692@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox