From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@googlemail.com>
Cc: "David Dillow" <dave@thedillows.org>,
"Francois Romieu" <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
"Rui Santos" <rsantos@grupopie.com>,
"Michael Büker" <m.bueker@berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:44:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905231644.13326.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1809B0.3030109@googlemail.com>
On Saturday 23 May 2009 16:35:28 Michael Riepe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot, Dave! This fixes the issue on my chip.
>
> Yep, it's stable here as well. And even a little faster than pci=nomsi.
> The only strangeness I observed is that the throughput (measured with
> iperf and a single TCP connection) varies:
>
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 667 MBytes 559 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 10.0-20.0 sec 803 MBytes 673 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 20.0-30.0 sec 802 MBytes 673 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 30.0-40.0 sec 714 MBytes 599 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 40.0-50.0 sec 669 MBytes 561 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 50.0-60.0 sec 791 MBytes 663 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 4.34 GBytes 622 Mbits/sec
Are you running the iperf server or client on the r8169?
I'm running the iperf server on the r8169 and get the following results:
mb@homer:~$ iperf -c 192.168.2.50 -t120 -i10
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.2.50, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.2.205 port 34739 connected with 192.168.2.50 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 789 MBytes 662 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 10.0-20.0 sec 791 MBytes 664 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 20.0-30.0 sec 799 MBytes 670 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 30.0-40.0 sec 794 MBytes 666 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 40.0-50.0 sec 795 MBytes 667 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 50.0-60.0 sec 793 MBytes 665 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 60.0-70.0 sec 800 MBytes 671 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 70.0-80.0 sec 795 MBytes 667 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 80.0-90.0 sec 800 MBytes 672 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 90.0-100.0 sec 797 MBytes 669 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 100.0-110.0 sec 789 MBytes 662 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 110.0-120.0 sec 791 MBytes 663 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 0.0-120.0 sec 9.31 GBytes 666 Mbits/sec
Looks acceptable to me.
The iperf client device is a BCM5780.
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-23 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-04 17:28 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too Michael Büker
2009-03-04 22:43 ` Francois Romieu
2009-03-06 0:17 ` Michael Büker
2009-03-08 10:27 ` Tom Weber
2009-03-10 5:42 ` Tom Weber
2009-03-09 12:07 ` Rui Santos
2009-03-13 18:29 ` Rui Santos
2009-03-16 13:07 ` Rui Santos
2009-03-22 21:12 ` Francois Romieu
2009-03-22 21:19 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-22 22:00 ` Francois Romieu
2009-03-22 22:09 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-22 22:27 ` Francois Romieu
2009-03-22 22:38 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-23 11:47 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-23 12:47 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-23 23:47 ` Francois Romieu
2009-03-24 9:43 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-23 14:29 ` Michael Büker
2009-03-23 14:57 ` Rui Santos
2009-03-23 15:04 ` Michael Büker
2009-03-25 11:40 ` Rui Santos
2009-04-04 17:50 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-10 13:38 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-10 15:01 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-10 15:10 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-10 15:53 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-10 16:27 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-10 17:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-11 0:29 ` David Dillow
2009-05-11 20:48 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-11 21:10 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-11 21:29 ` David Dillow
2009-05-11 21:59 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-12 20:29 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-14 2:38 ` David Dillow
2009-05-14 18:37 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-14 19:14 ` David Dillow
2009-05-14 19:42 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-23 1:29 ` [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts David Dillow
2009-05-23 9:24 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-23 14:35 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-23 14:44 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-05-23 15:01 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-23 16:40 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-23 14:51 ` David Dillow
2009-05-23 16:12 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-23 16:45 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-23 16:46 ` David Dillow
2009-05-23 16:50 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-23 16:53 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-23 17:03 ` David Dillow
2009-05-24 21:15 ` Francois Romieu
2009-05-24 22:55 ` David Dillow
2009-05-26 5:55 ` David Miller
2009-05-26 18:22 ` Michael Buesch
2009-05-26 21:52 ` David Miller
2009-05-26 22:14 ` David Miller
2009-05-26 22:40 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-26 22:43 ` David Miller
2009-05-26 23:10 ` David Miller
2009-05-27 16:19 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-16 19:32 ` Rui Santos
2009-08-21 20:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-21 21:22 ` Michael Riepe
2009-08-21 22:59 ` David Dillow
2009-08-21 23:34 ` David Dillow
2009-08-22 0:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-22 11:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-22 12:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-22 20:43 ` David Dillow
2009-08-23 17:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-23 17:43 ` Michal Soltys
2009-08-23 17:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-24 2:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-25 0:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-25 2:59 ` David Dillow
2009-08-25 20:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-25 20:40 ` David Dillow
2009-08-25 21:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-25 21:46 ` David Dillow
2009-08-25 22:19 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-26 3:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-26 7:58 ` [PATCH] r8169: Reduce looping in the interrupt handler Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-26 13:56 ` David Dillow
2009-08-26 13:59 ` David Dillow
2009-08-26 20:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-26 21:30 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-26 21:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-27 5:24 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-27 5:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-27 23:20 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-28 1:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-28 1:29 ` David Dillow
2009-08-30 20:37 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-30 20:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-01 3:33 ` David Dillow
2009-09-01 9:20 ` Francois Romieu
2009-08-25 21:37 ` [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-25 21:54 ` David Dillow
2009-08-25 23:11 ` Francois Romieu
2009-05-12 11:10 ` 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too Krzysztof Halasa
2009-05-12 21:45 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-13 6:11 ` Francois Romieu
2009-05-13 6:27 ` Michael Riepe
2009-05-13 19:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905231644.13326.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=dave@thedillows.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.bueker@berlin.de \
--cc=michael.riepe@googlemail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=rsantos@grupopie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox