public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@morethan.org>
To: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@viatech.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 07:48:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905240748.29600.lkml@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090524070415.GI20452@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

On Sun May 24 2009, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:44:52AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> 
> > *) The HP-2133 MiniNote uses the cn896 chipset, which
> > has not yet been released from NDA.
> 
> I can see towards getting that changed, but I doubt this helps us with the
> current problem.
> 
> > I do not have the C7-M technical reference, it is still
> > under NDA.
> 
> I obviously have access to that documentation (which is also on its way
> to become public, but needs more time) - but believe me, there is nothing
> in that documentation that would help you to debug this problem :(
> 
> > *But* if a developer on this list has a copy of the
> > manual *and* owns one of these three brands of machine -
> > they would have fixed their own machine a year ago.
> 
> I actually own a 2133 mininote, but I rarely used it for anything but to test
> openchrome on it.  What do you suggest me to try?
>

The HP-2133 (C7-M/CN896) did not fail yesterday.
Find a C7-M/CX700 machine.

You might hook the rss feed at:
http://forum.netbookuser.com/viewforum.php?id=8
where my rants/raves/speculations are logged and
the other people helping me test make their comments.

In particular:

The original instructions (including download url):
http://forum.netbookuser.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6702#p6702

Updated installation instructions:
http://forum.netbookuser.com/viewtopic.php?id=907 

Also ignore anything you read in LKML that I have been doing
this in secret - those authors just never got the memo. ;)

> I also have some other systems with a C7-M, so I can certainly verify
> certain code on a number of them, if a good testcase exists.
> 

Still working towards a specific test case - only thing at this
point it the sledge hammer of putting the "lock" back in, everywhere.

Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-24 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-22 16:39 [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 18:23 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-22 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-22 18:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-22 19:20     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 22:21     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 23:30       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-23  0:45         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-23  0:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-23 10:44             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-23 11:18               ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-24  7:04               ` Harald Welte
2009-05-24 12:48                 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2009-05-24 15:43                 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 22:13               ` Roland Dreier
2009-05-27 22:33                 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-23 15:52             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-23 18:04             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-23 23:44               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-24  6:49                 ` Harald Welte
2009-05-24 12:38                   ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-24 17:31                     ` Harald Welte
2009-05-27 12:18                   ` Re:[VIA Support] was: " Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 12:22                     ` [VIA " Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 12:47                     ` Harald Welte
2009-05-27 13:00                       ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-29 12:06                     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-30 15:48                   ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-24 12:27                 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-24 17:22                   ` Harald Welte
2009-05-24 18:00                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-24 18:32                     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-24 18:46                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-24 19:09                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 19:03                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 19:18                           ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 19:46                             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 21:10                               ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 21:17                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 23:03                                   ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 23:35                                     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-26  0:05                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-26 12:37                                       ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-26 17:13                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25  1:31                       ` i2c-viapro / via-fb drivers on VIA CX700 Harald Welte
2009-05-25 12:54                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 13:36                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-25 16:05                       ` [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28 20:30                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-28 20:54                       ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28 23:15                         ` [Futex RFC] was " Michael S. Zick
2009-05-29  2:00                           ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 17:01                 ` LOCK prefix on uni processor has its use (was Re: [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic) Harald Welte
2009-05-27 17:10                   ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 17:19                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-27 17:25                     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 18:08                   ` LOCK prefix on uni processor has its use Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 18:22                     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 18:33                       ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 18:55                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-27 18:38                       ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-02 12:48                     ` Harald Welte
2009-06-02 13:03                       ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-02 13:26                         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-06-02 13:42                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 11:46                             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28  2:56                   ` LOCK prefix on uni processor has its use (was Re: [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic) H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-23 20:51             ` [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28 12:48       ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-28 13:29         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28 20:50           ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-28 20:58             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-28 21:16               ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-28 21:21                 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 19:17   ` Michael S. Zick
     [not found] ` <200905221343.30638.lkml@morethan.org>
     [not found]   ` <20090522192329.GF846@one.firstfloor.org>
2009-05-22 19:53     ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 20:05       ` Samuel Thibault
2009-05-22 20:32         ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 20:42           ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-22 20:57             ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 20:43           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-05-22 21:59             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-22 22:00               ` Samuel Thibault
2009-05-22 22:14                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-22 22:14                   ` Samuel Thibault
2009-05-22 20:45           ` Roland Dreier
2009-05-24 18:59           ` Robert Hancock
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 18:50 Michael S. Zick
2009-05-22 19:24 ` Roland Dreier
2009-05-22 20:03   ` Michael S. Zick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905240748.29600.lkml@morethan.org \
    --to=lkml@morethan.org \
    --cc=HaraldWelte@viatech.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox