From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/workqueue: Get rid of searching last executed worklet in probe_worklet_complete()
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:30:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090524213028.GE6471@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1610B6.7010203@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:40:54AM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> We don't need search workqueue's worklet list for worklet which was latest
> executed, instead, we can use a pointer in cpu_workqueue_stats to remember
> which worklet was just executed.
>
> Thanks Oleg for pointing it out.
>
> Changelog:
> v1->v2: Oleg pointed out that if searching executed workfunc_stats failed
> in probe_worklet_execute(), for example, workfunc_stats's memory allocation
> failed previously, cpu_workqueue_stats->last_workfunc is not set to correct
> value, and it will cause wrong accessing in probe_worklet_complete().
> This problem is fixed in v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Looks good, thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Frederic.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> index c67be60..740de3b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> @@ -25,13 +25,6 @@ struct workfunc_stats {
> unsigned int inserted;
> unsigned int executed;
>
> - /*
> - * save latest work_struct's pointer to use as identifier in
> - * probe_worklet_complete, because we can't use work_struct->...
> - * after worklet got executed
> - */
> - void *work;
> -
> /* save execution time temporarily for calculate executed time */
> u64 start_time;
> u64 max_executed_time;
> @@ -46,10 +39,17 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_stats {
> /* Protected by cpu workqueue lock */
> unsigned int inserted;
> unsigned int executed;
> +
> /* list of struct workfunc_stats in this workqueue */
> struct list_head workfunclist;
>
> /*
> + * pointer to last executed worklet's workfunc_stats in this workqueue,
> + * used by probe_worklet_complete()
> + */
> + struct workfunc_stats *last_workfunc;
> +
> + /*
> * the task maybe destroyed when we read stat file
> * we define it to void * because we only use it as a identifier
> */
> @@ -163,9 +163,10 @@ found_wq:
> if (wfnode->func == work->func) {
> wfnode->executed++;
> wfnode->start_time = trace_clock_global();
> - wfnode->work = work;
> + node->last_workfunc = wfnode;
> goto found_wf;
> }
> + node->last_workfunc = NULL;
> pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
> goto end;
>
> @@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
> {
> int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
> struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
> - struct workfunc_stats *wfnode;
> + u64 executed_time;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
> @@ -192,22 +193,14 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
> goto end;
>
> found_wq:
> - list_for_each_entry(wfnode, &node->workfunclist, list) {
> - u64 executed_time;
> + if (!node->last_workfunc)
> + goto end;
>
> - if (wfnode->work != work)
> - continue;
> + executed_time = trace_clock_global() - node->last_workfunc->start_time;
> + node->last_workfunc->total_time += executed_time;
> + if (executed_time > node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time)
> + node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time = executed_time;
>
> - executed_time = trace_clock_global() - wfnode->start_time;
> - wfnode->total_time += executed_time;
> - if (executed_time > wfnode->max_executed_time)
> - wfnode->max_executed_time = executed_time;
> - goto found_wf;
> - }
> - pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
> - goto end;
> -
> -found_wf:
> end:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
> }
> --
> 1.5.5.3
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-24 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 10:56 [PATCH] tracing/workqueue: Get rid of searching last executed worklet in probe_worklet_complete() Zhaolei
2009-05-21 13:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-22 0:42 ` [PATCH] tracing/workqueue: Get rid of searching last executedworklet " Zhaolei
2009-05-22 2:40 ` [PATCH v2] tracing/workqueue: Get rid of searching last executed worklet " Zhaolei
2009-05-22 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-26 20:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-05-27 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-24 21:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090524213028.GE6471@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox