From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755837AbZEZVEf (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750883AbZEZVE0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:26 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45745 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752357AbZEZVEZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:04:08 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Menage Cc: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, davem@davemloft.net, tgraf@suug.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cls_cgroup: read classid atomically in classifier Message-Id: <20090526140408.6c829124.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090526195840.8464.36548.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20090526195840.8464.36548.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 May 2009 12:59:11 -0700 Paul Menage wrote: > Avoid reading the unsynchronized value cs->classid multiple times, > since it could change concurrently from non-zero to zero; this would > result in the classifier returning a positive result with a bogus > (zero) classid. When this race occurs, what are the user-visible consequences? People who need to decide to which kernels a patch should be applied like to know such things.