From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.a.30-rc7: fat filesystem misdetected as amiga
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:07:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090526160735.GB9842@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090526160343.GA9842@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:03:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:04:01AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:08:12PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > So apparently this is a bug in the device; it doesn't respond correctly
> > > > > > to the first READ command. But since it does respond correctly to
> > > > > > later commands, everything works okay thereafter. You ought to be able
> > > > > > to recover from the error by running
> > > > > >
> > > > > > blockdev --rereadpt /dev/sdb
> > > > > >
> > > > > > manually.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, this helps.
> > > > > Would it make sense for kernel to retry automatically?
> > > > > Why doesn't it?
> > > >
> > > > I don't know the details in this case. Most likely the error code
> > > > (Logical Block Address Out of Range) is interpreted as a fatal
> > > > non-retryable error. For other sorts of errors, the kernel does retry.
> > >
> > > Who would know? The scsi crowd?
> >
> > They would know. But it's easy enough to find out. (Looks through
> > the SCSI code...) Here we go. scsi_io_completion() contains this:
> >
> > case ILLEGAL_REQUEST:
> > /* If we had an ILLEGAL REQUEST returned, then
> > * we may have performed an unsupported
> > * command. The only thing this should be
> > * would be a ten byte read where only a six
> > * byte read was supported. Also, on a system
> > * where READ CAPACITY failed, we may have
> > * read past the end of the disk.
> > */
> > if ((cmd->device->use_10_for_rw &&
> > sshdr.asc == 0x20 && sshdr.ascq == 0x00) &&
> > (cmd->cmnd[0] == READ_10 ||
> > cmd->cmnd[0] == WRITE_10)) {
> > /* This will issue a new 6-byte command. */
> > cmd->device->use_10_for_rw = 0;
> > action = ACTION_REPREP;
> > } else if (sshdr.asc == 0x10) /* DIX */ {
> > description = "Host Data Integrity Failure";
> > action = ACTION_FAIL;
> > error = -EILSEQ;
> > } else
> > action = ACTION_FAIL;
> > break;
>
> Which kernel version is this? I see different code in 2.6.30-rc7.
Sorry, looked at the wrong file.
I see this in drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-26 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-25 12:57 2.a.30-rc7: fat filesystem misdetected as amiga Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 14:00 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-25 15:32 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-25 18:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 19:32 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-25 19:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 20:00 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-25 20:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 20:37 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-25 20:41 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-25 20:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 20:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 21:08 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-25 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-26 14:04 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-26 16:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-26 16:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-05-26 16:51 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-26 16:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 21:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 22:31 ` Andries E. Brouwer
2009-05-25 23:05 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-26 2:26 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-26 6:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-26 6:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-25 23:17 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090526160735.GB9842@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox