From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760792AbZEZXZh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:25:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760264AbZEZXZY (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:25:24 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42882 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760133AbZEZXZW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:25:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:24:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Matt Helsley Cc: adobriyan@gmail.com, xemul@parallels.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/38] Remove struct mm_struct::exe_file et al Message-Id: <20090526162415.fb9cefef.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090526113618.GJ28083@us.ibm.com> References: <20090526113618.GJ28083@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 May 2009 04:36:18 -0700 Matt Helsley wrote: > I don't see any mention in the changelog of the point brought up by Ingo: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/105 Nor of Eric's comments. Alexey, pleeeze don't do this. We (read: I) heavily depend upon patch submitters to keep track of outstanding issues and review comments, etc. If the patch submitter simply blows these things off then it devolves to me having to keep track of each patch's issue list as well as the patch itself. My workload goes up by a factor of N and the error rate goes up by N^2 :(