From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758944AbZEZXJo (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:09:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758389AbZEZXJh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:09:37 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:59833 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758180AbZEZXJg (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:09:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:14:44 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, xemul@parallels.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff Message-ID: <20090526231444.GA23602@hallyn.com> References: <1242968132-1044-1-git-send-email-adobriyan@gmail.com> <1242968132-1044-18-git-send-email-adobriyan@gmail.com> <20090526131644.GA20920@hallyn.com> <20090526193503.GB11909@x200.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090526193503.GB11909@x200.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com): > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:44AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Honestly, I have great respect for your coding abilities. And if 'voices > > from on high' tell us to base upon your code, I'd be fine with that, I > > have no real problems with what I see on yet another cursory look. But > > given the amount of collective time that's been spent developing, reviewing, > > and testing Oren's set, it wouldn't make any sense to just jump. So > > I'd still just like to know how you see this proceeding. > > Yes, please, someone decide on "checkpoint semi-live container" issue. Well, *I* for one did decide :) I decided that checkpointing a semi-live container will not bother the kernel, and so the user gets to decide by passing a flag into sys_checkpoint() whether he is ok with a checkpoint if the container was semi-live. BTW - it looks like your ISP is causing your emails to be flagged as spam by several servers? Several people don't seem to be receiving your patchsets. -serge