From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: paul@mad-scientist.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090527183109.GA30574@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wkjobbm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On 05/26, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> When a signal happens during core dump the core dump to a pipe
> can fail, because the write returns short, but the ELF core dumpers
> cannot handle that.
>
> There's no reason to handle signals during core dumping, so just
> block them all.
Actually, I think there is a strong reason to handle signals during
core dumping. The coredump can take a lot of time/resources, not good
it looks like unkillable procees to users.
Please look at
killable/interruptible coredumps
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121665710711931
at least, I think SIGKILL should terminate core dumping.
> Open issue: ELF puts blocked signals into the core dump and
> that will be always fully blocked now. Need to save it somewhere?
>
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc5-ak.orig/fs/exec.c 2009-05-14 11:46:24.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc5-ak/fs/exec.c 2009-05-26 22:22:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1760,6 +1760,12 @@
> goto fail;
> }
>
> + /* block all signals */
> + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + sigfillset(¤t->blocked);
> + /* No recalc sigpending */
> + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
Perhaps it makes sense to do
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struc
/*
* The process is in the middle of dying, nothing to do.
*/
+ return 0;
} else if (sig_kernel_stop(sig)) {
/*
* This is a stop signal. Remove SIGCONT from all queues.
instead, this was discussed before. This way the exiting/coredumping
task ignores all signals, and we cab simplify complete_signal() a bit.
This all needs more discussion, but imho for now something like
Paul's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124340506200729
is the best workaround. Note that we have the same dump_write()
in binfmt_elf.c and binfmt_aout.c, perhaps it makes sense to
create coredump_file_write() helper in fs/exec.c.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-27 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-26 16:33 [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing Paul Smith
2009-05-26 18:01 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 21:09 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 0:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 6:02 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 6:17 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 7:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 7:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 8:52 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 20:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2009-05-29 10:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-27 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-05-27 18:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 19:49 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 20:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:22 ` Paul Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 12:34 Paul Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090527183109.GA30574@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@mad-scientist.net \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox