public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: paul@mad-scientist.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:31:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090527183109.GA30574@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wkjobbm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On 05/26, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> When a signal happens during core dump the core dump to a pipe
> can fail, because the write returns short, but the ELF core dumpers
> cannot handle that.
>
> There's no reason to handle signals during core dumping, so just
> block them all.

Actually, I think there is a strong reason to handle signals during
core dumping. The coredump can take a lot of time/resources, not good
it looks like unkillable procees to users.

Please look at

	killable/interruptible coredumps
	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121665710711931

at least, I think SIGKILL should terminate core dumping.

> Open issue: ELF puts blocked signals into the core dump and
> that will be always fully blocked now.  Need to save it somewhere?
>
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc5-ak.orig/fs/exec.c	2009-05-14 11:46:24.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc5-ak/fs/exec.c	2009-05-26 22:22:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1760,6 +1760,12 @@
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>
> +	/* block all signals */
> +	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> +	sigfillset(&current->blocked);
> +	/* No recalc sigpending */
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);

Perhaps it makes sense to do

	--- a/kernel/signal.c
	+++ b/kernel/signal.c
	@@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struc
			/*
			 * The process is in the middle of dying, nothing to do.
			 */
	+		 return 0;
		} else if (sig_kernel_stop(sig)) {
			/*
			 * This is a stop signal.  Remove SIGCONT from all queues.

instead, this was discussed before. This way the exiting/coredumping
task ignores all signals, and we cab simplify complete_signal() a bit.


This all needs more discussion, but imho for now something like
Paul's patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124340506200729
is the best workaround. Note that we have the same dump_write()
in binfmt_elf.c and binfmt_aout.c, perhaps it makes sense to
create coredump_file_write() helper in fs/exec.c.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26 16:33 [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing Paul Smith
2009-05-26 18:01 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 21:09   ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 23:00   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:14     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:28       ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:41         ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:45           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  0:11             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  0:29               ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  6:02                 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27  6:17                 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27  7:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  7:45                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  8:52                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  8:56                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 20:25           ` Jesper Juhl
2009-05-29 10:34           ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-27 18:31   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-05-27 18:50     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 19:05       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 19:49         ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 20:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:04     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:22       ` Paul Smith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 12:34 Paul Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090527183109.GA30574@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@mad-scientist.net \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox