From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753847AbZE2V3v (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 17:29:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752313AbZE2V3n (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 17:29:43 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59076 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752142AbZE2V3n convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 17:29:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090529.142942.136882164.davem@davemloft.net> To: pasik@iki.fi Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, jeremy@goop.org, mingo@elte.hu, dan.magenheimer@oracle.com, avi@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, kurt.hackel@oracle.com, Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com, ksrinivasan@novell.com, EAnderson@novell.com, wimcoekaerts@wimmekes.net, stephen.spector@citrix.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, npiggin@suse.de Subject: Re: Xen is a feature From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090529141439.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090528.210559.137121893.davem@davemloft.net> <4A1FCE8E.2060604@eu.citrix.com> <20090529141439.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pasi Kärkkäinen Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:14:39 +0300 > We really need Xen dom0 support in mainline Linux. Whether we want a feature is seperate from making sure it's implementation is up to snuff and doesn't suck. But the concentration of the talk seems to be on wanting the feature, and that's only half the story. I'm getting sick of hearing over and over how many people use Xen, that point has been made succintly so let's move on ok?