From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, mingo@elte.hu, norsk5@yahoo.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, mchehab@redhat.com,
aris@redhat.com, edt@aei.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:01:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090529130115.a44efaee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090529103329.GB23530@aftab>
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:33:29 +0200
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 May 2009 20:43:53 +0200
> > Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > > here are some minor fixlets which came up lately. I'm sending them
> > > separately as an offset from the rest of the patchset since nothing has
> > > changed there. For details, see
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git for-next
> >
> > My linux-next x86_64 allmodconfig fails to build drivers/edac/amd64_edac.o:
> >
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:3026: Error: no such instruction: `popcnt %eax,%ecx'
>
> I guess this is a rather old(er) toolchain you got there. What do
>
> as --version
> gcc --version
>
> say?
gcc-4.0.2, gas-2.16.1
Here's your sent-off-list patch (please don't do that):
diff -puN drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c~edac-build-fix drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c~edac-build-fix
+++ a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static u32 f10_determine_channel(struct
if (dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) == 0)
cs = sys_addr >> 6 & 1;
else if ((dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) >> 1) & 1) {
- temp = popcnt((u32) ((sys_addr >> 16) & 0x1F)) % 2;
+ temp = hweight_long((u32) ((sys_addr >> 16) & 0x1F)) % 2;
if (dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) & 1)
cs = (sys_addr >> 9 & 1) ^ temp;
diff -puN drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h~edac-build-fix drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h~edac-build-fix
+++ a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -443,19 +443,6 @@ enum {
#define K8_MSR_MC4STAT 0x0411
#define K8_MSR_MC4ADDR 0x0412
-/*
- * popcnt - count the set bits in a bit vector.
- * @vec - bit vector
- *
- * This instruction is supported only on F10h and later CPUs.
- */
-#define popcnt(x) \
-({ \
- typeof(x) __ret; \
- __asm__("popcnt %1, %0" : "=r" (__ret) : "r" (x)); \
- __ret; \
-})
-
/* AMD sets the first MC device at device ID 0x18. */
static inline int get_mc_node_id_from_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
_
That'll work.
A suitable way to solve all this would be to arrange for x86's hweight()
to use the popcnt instruction, where that makes sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 18:43 [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: msr.h: fix build error Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] amd64_edac: do not enable module by default Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] EDAC: do not enable modules " Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] amd64_edac: add MAINTAINERS entry Borislav Petkov
2009-05-20 21:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes Randy Dunlap
2009-05-28 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-29 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-29 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-30 8:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-30 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-30 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-30 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 14:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-06-01 16:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-01 17:31 ` H.J. Lu
2009-06-01 18:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-06-01 18:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-03 18:20 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090529130115.a44efaee.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=edt@aei.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox