From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: paul@mad-scientist.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:11:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090601171119.GA13970@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090601174159.48acf3f5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On 06/01, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I think. As for other unhandled sig_fatal() signals, I am nor sure.
> > I can make a patch, but first I need to know what this patch should do.
> > Again, please look at:
>
> If you are on the command line then SIGINT/SIGQUIT would be the obvious
> ones for this ?
Not sure I understand. Do you mean we should treat the tty signals
specially ?
Personally, I don't think we should. If we decide that only SIGKILL
interrupts the coredumping, then I think ^C should not interrupt.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-01 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-31 5:33 [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate Paul Smith
2009-05-31 10:18 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-31 14:03 ` Olivier Galibert
2009-05-31 16:31 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-31 16:49 ` Olivier Galibert
2009-05-31 17:46 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-31 16:56 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-01 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-01 16:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-01 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-06-01 17:46 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-01 18:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-01 20:38 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-01 22:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-01 23:02 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-02 0:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-03 7:09 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-04 3:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-04 17:14 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-23 17:31 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-23 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-07 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-02 8:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-02 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-03 7:15 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-03 14:05 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-01 17:36 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-01 17:49 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-01 18:39 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-01 19:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-01 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-01 19:06 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-01 19:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-01 19:51 ` Paul Smith
2009-06-01 20:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-01 21:34 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090601171119.GA13970@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@mad-scientist.net \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox