From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sched_clock() clocksource handling.
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090602141737.GA2449@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090602071718.GA17710@linux-sh.org>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:17:18PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> sched: sched_clock() clocksource handling.
>
> There are presently a number of issues and limitations with how the
> clocksource and sched_clock() interaction works today. Configurations
> tend to be grouped in to one of the following:
>
> - Platform provides a clocksource unsuitable for sched_clock()
> and prefers to use the generic jiffies-backed implementation.
>
> - Platform provides its own clocksource and sched_clock() that
> wraps in to it.
>
> - Platform uses a generic clocksource (ie, drivers/clocksource/)
> combined with the generic jiffies-backed sched_clock().
>
> - Platform supports multiple sched_clock()-capable clocksources.
>
> This patch adds a new CLOCK_SOURCE_USE_FOR_SCHED_CLOCK flag to address
> these issues, which can be set for any sched_clock()-capable clocksource.
>
> The generic sched_clock() implementation is likewise switched over to
> always read from a designated sched_clocksource, which is default
> initialized to the jiffies clocksource and updated based on the
> availability of CLOCK_SOURCE_USE_FOR_SCHED_CLOCK sources. As this uses
> the generic cyc2ns() logic on the clocksource ->read(), most of the
> platform-specific sched_clock() implementations can subsequently be
> killed off.
80ea3bac3a47bc73efa334d0dd57099d0ff14216 ("ARM: OMAP: sched_clock()
corrected") seems to have switched omap from cyc2ns() to an open coded
calculation based on mult_orig because cyc2ns() uses the NTP-adjusted
mult instead. Does that apply here or is that change incorrect?
Rabin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 7:17 [PATCH] sched: sched_clock() clocksource handling Paul Mundt
2009-06-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-02 7:35 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-02 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-02 7:54 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-02 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-02 8:00 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-02 11:49 ` Daniel Walker
2009-06-02 20:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-03 3:36 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-03 14:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-06-02 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-02 20:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-03 3:39 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-02 14:17 ` Rabin Vincent [this message]
2009-06-02 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-02 22:24 ` john stultz
2009-06-03 7:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090602141737.GA2449@debian \
--to=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox