public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, Second try
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:07:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090603140742.GA22953@tango.0pointer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090529083840.GA15516@omega>

On Fri, 29.05.09 10:38, Lennart Poettering (mzxreary@0pointer.de) wrote:

> This patch introduces a new flag SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK which can be passed
> to the kernel via sched_setscheduler(), ORed in the policy parameter. If
> set this will make sure that when the process forks a) the scheduling
> priority is reset to DEFAULT_PRIO if it was higher and b) the scheduling
> policy is reset to SCHED_NORMAL if it was either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.

[...]

> This current patch compiles but is not otherwise tested. For now, I am
> sending this primarily as a request for comments. So please, I'd love to
> hear your comments!

I have now done some testing to make sure it actually works as
advertised. Everything seems to be fine. For those interested here's a
little test program that verifies that RR scheduling is properly
removed from the child process but is kept enabled in the parent process:

http://0pointer.de/public/reset-on-fork.c
 
Ingo, how can I bribe you into taking this patch, or at least
commenting on it?

Thanks,

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-03 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29  8:38 [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, Second try Lennart Poettering
2009-05-29  9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-29 10:39   ` Lennart Poettering
2009-06-03 14:07 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2009-06-05 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-05 14:55   ` Lennart Poettering
2009-06-07 10:11     ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-03 12:33 Raz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090603140742.GA22953@tango.0pointer.de \
    --to=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox