From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754145AbZFCV3X (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:29:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756344AbZFCV3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:29:14 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:39217 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756632AbZFCV3L (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:29:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:22:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Randy Dunlap , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (driver core) Message-ID: <20090603212206.GA20804@suse.de> References: <20090603190952.2dd0cc70.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A269BB2.4050508@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A269BB2.4050508@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:50:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Looks like a real rush since -rc7 ... > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `register_mem_sect_under_node': > (.text+0x1d305b): undefined reference to `sysfs_create_link_nowarn' > > > I can't find this function's implementation when CONFIG_SYSFS=y. Ah, it looks like this shows up when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE is set. Eric, your patch, "sysfs: Remove now unnecessary error reporting suppression." caused this. Turns out it is still used in the tree, and you forgot to remove the function from sysfs.h at the same time. I'm going to drop it, and the other two patches I took from you for sysfs, as it doesn't make sense to have them in the tree yet. Care to rework your series with this fixed? thanks, greg k-h