From: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
To: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: Add 400ms to CAFE SD controller resume path
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:33:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090604233349.GA2545@plexity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090528104823.0a551ecb@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
On May 28 2009, at 10:48, Pierre Ossman was caught saying:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 01:36:29 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 May 2009 13:51:50 +0200 Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Reading through that report, I don't believe you properly worked around
> > > the bug. You only avoid bug 1339, but that's only mildly related.
> > >
> > > What this workaround does is to make sure that MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME
> > > actually works. But if you change cards during suspend, the VFS bug
> > > should reappear and you'll corrupt the partition table.
> >
> > What do you think the VFS did wrong here?
> >
>
> Might be the block layer as well. Somehow requests associated with an
> old block device end up on the queue of a new block device. I don't
> see how this can happen given Linux' device model, but somehow it does.
The request is not ending up in the queue of the new device. If I
recall correctyl What is happening is that userspace does an unmount on the
old device when it receives the notification that it is gone (since it is not
redected and a new entry is created). By the time that unmount is called, the
various data structures for the device has been zeroed out but the various
operation pointers are !NULL, so when we go back to write the superblock for
the mounted partition, we overwrite the device's partition table as the
partition offset is now 0. The main issue here is that the kernel is allowing
an I/O to a device that is technically still there but not from the kernel's
POV.
~Deepak
--
In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask
"why were their poets silent?" - Bertold Brecht
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-04 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 20:05 [PATCH] MMC: Add 400ms to CAFE SD controller resume path Deepak Saxena
2009-05-22 11:51 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-05-28 8:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 8:48 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-04 23:33 ` Deepak Saxena [this message]
2009-06-13 10:34 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090604233349.GA2545@plexity.net \
--to=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox