From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPU hard limits
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:33:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605030309.GA3872@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A27BBCA.5020606@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:19:22PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> 2. Need for hard limiting CPU resource
>> --------------------------------------
>> - Pay-per-use: In enterprise systems that cater to multiple clients/customers
>> where a customer demands a certain share of CPU resources and pays only
>> that, CPU hard limits will be useful to hard limit the customer's job
>> to consume only the specified amount of CPU resource.
>> - In container based virtualization environments running multiple containers,
>> hard limits will be useful to ensure a container doesn't exceed its
>> CPU entitlement.
>> - Hard limits can be used to provide guarantees.
>>
> How can hard limits provide guarantees?
>
> Let's take an example where I have 1 group that I wish to guarantee a
> 20% share of the cpu, and anther 8 groups with no limits or guarantees.
>
> One way to achieve the guarantee is to hard limit each of the 8 other
> groups to 10%; the sum total of the limits is 80%, leaving 20% for the
> guarantee group. The downside is the arbitrary limit imposed on the
> other groups.
This method sounds very similar to the openvz method:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Guarantees_for_resources
>
> Another way is to place the 8 groups in a container group, and limit
> that to 80%. But that doesn't work if I want to provide guarantees to
> several groups.
Hmm why not ? Reduce the guarantee of the container group and provide
the same to additional groups ?
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 5:36 [RFC] CPU hard limits Bharata B Rao
2009-06-04 12:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-04 21:32 ` Mike Waychison
2009-06-05 3:03 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2009-06-05 3:33 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 4:37 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 4:44 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 4:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 5:09 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 5:13 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 5:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 5:21 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 5:27 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 5:31 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 6:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 8:16 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-07 6:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 16:14 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 9:39 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 13:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:42 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-07 6:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 14:54 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-07 6:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 6:03 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 6:32 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 12:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 5:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 5:20 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 3:07 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 8:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 9:27 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 9:32 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 9:48 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 9:51 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 9:59 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 10:03 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-08 8:50 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-06-05 9:36 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 9:48 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 9:55 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 9:57 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 10:02 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 11:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-05 12:18 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-07 10:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-07 15:35 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-08 4:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-05 14:44 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 13:02 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:43 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 14:45 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 9:02 ` Reinhard Tartler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090605030309.GA3872@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox