public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPU hard limits
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:02:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605113217.GA20786@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830906050153i1afd104fqe70f681317349142@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:53:15AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> This claim (and the subsequent long thread it generated on how limits
> can provide guarantees) confused me a bit.
> 
> Why do we need limits to provide guarantees when we can already
> provide guarantees via shares?

I think the interval over which we need guarantee matters here. Shares
can generally provide guaranteed share of resource over longer (sometimes
minutes) intervals. For high-priority bursty workloads, the latency in 
achieving guaranteed resource usage matters. By having hard-limits, we are 
"reserving" (potentially idle) slots where the high-priority group can run and 
claim its guaranteed share almost immediately.

- vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04  5:36 [RFC] CPU hard limits Bharata B Rao
2009-06-04 12:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-04 21:32   ` Mike Waychison
2009-06-05  3:03   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  3:33     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  4:37       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  4:44         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  4:49           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:09             ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05  5:13               ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:10             ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:21               ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:27                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:31                   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  6:01                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  8:16                       ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-07  6:04                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 16:14                           ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  9:39                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 13:14                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:42                           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-07  6:09                             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 14:54                           ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-07  6:10                             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  9:24                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  6:03                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  6:32                     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 12:57                       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:16             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:20               ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  3:07   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  8:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:27   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  9:32     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:48       ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05  9:51         ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:59           ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 10:03             ` Paul Menage
2009-06-08  8:50               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-06-05  9:36   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  9:48     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:55       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  9:57         ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 10:02         ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 11:32   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2009-06-05 12:18     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-07 10:11       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-07 15:35         ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-08  4:37           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-05 14:44     ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 13:02   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:43     ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 14:45       ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05  9:02 ` Reinhard Tartler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090605113217.GA20786@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox