From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753807AbZFFW6X (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:58:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751803AbZFFW6O (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:58:14 -0400 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:36766 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671AbZFFW6N (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:58:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 23:58:02 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Andrew Morton , Woody Suwalski , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, eric@anholt.net, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, tim.gardner@canonical.com, stefan.bader@canonical.com Subject: Re: Intel 915GM MCHBAR bug Message-ID: <20090606225802.GL10751@shadowen.org> References: <4A242C81.6020906@cs.helsinki.fi> <4A298971.5080006@xandros.com> <4A2A0951.1020608@cs.helsinki.fi> <20090605232711.d8503262.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4A2A0E8C.1010109@cs.helsinki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A2A0E8C.1010109@cs.helsinki.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:37:00AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:14:41 +0300 Pekka Enberg > wrote: >>>>> Wanna show us the patch? >>>>> >>>>> Because the world could certainly do with more i915 bugfixes :( >>>> Here is Jesse's patch from >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2009-January/001186.html >>>> adopted for 2.6.30-rc8... (needed to redo hunk #3 for >>>> i915_gem_tile.c) >>> Yup. I took the two patches from here: >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/349314 >>> >>> and did the same rediffing on top of 2.6.30-rc8 for the first one. >>> >>> Andrew, do you want me to forward you the (tested) patches or should >>> we wait for Jesse et al to take care of it? >> >> Yes, please send them out. > > OK, I did that. I am bit unhappy that I had to do it, though. The patch > dates back to January (!) and Ubuntu folks have been carrying it for a > while now. We cirtainly have been carrying for some time. My understanding was that the maintainers had it and had been expecting it to merge through them. Did we miss a trick somewhere? -apw