From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] x86: adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 15:40:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090607134009.GE12088@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090603142727.GI5736@alberich.amd.com>
* Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> wrote:
> Changes to previous patch set:
> - remove MULTI_NODE_CPU config option
> - provide defaults for cpu_node topology information
> - add patch to fix AMD mcheck code
>
> Current patch set contains 5 patches:
> - patch 1 adapts common code to show cpu_node_id,
> cpu_node_siblings and cpu_node_siblings_list in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology
> - patch 2 prepares arch/x86 to provide cpu_node information
> - patch 3 sets up cpu_node information for AMD Magny-Cours CPU
> - patch 4 fixes L3 cache information for Magny-Cours
> - patch 5 fixes mcheck code for Magny-Cours
it would be really nice to propagate this info to where it _really_
matters: the sched-domains topology info - unless i'm missing
something this patch-set does not do that yet, right? That way we'll
get actual feedback if it's broken, and will help people if it works
right. Device allocation matters too, but to a much lesser degree.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-07 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 14:27 [PATCH 0/5 v3] x86: adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] topology: introduce cpu_node information for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:33 ` Bert Wesarg
2009-06-03 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: provide CPU topology " Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: add cpu_node topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:48 ` Bert Wesarg
2009-06-03 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/5 retry] " Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: cacheinfo: fixup L3 cache information " Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-03 14:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mcheck: make use of cpu_node_mask instead of cpu_core_mask to support multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-06-07 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/5 v3] x86: adapt CPU topology detection for AMD Magny-Cours Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090607134009.GE12088@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=bert.wesarg@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox