From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754099AbZFGXmS (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:42:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752734AbZFGXmG (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:42:06 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com ([209.85.218.213]:44185 "EHLO mail-bw0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479AbZFGXmF (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:42:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=e/u0y4xUsyKpcIBIH5loZxWcDGVK/EMSqtpm6Bs10s0gXCkOpsfRYkUQ3kU4EutIS0 0KdPRjszyjntRTvupsVUXrA2xarq4wYaL5wSahsbS2KgwjvgYb1hokShkK6FIfPLWotY /Hcm5ZPI4sHurPEPjf08Jp6WR3gxKtksNvorU= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:47:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.30-rc8-next-20090605-07377-g5acd34e; KDE/4.2.3; i686; ; ) Cc: Pekka Enberg , James Bottomley , Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200906071444.33047.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200906072125.40784.bzolnier@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906080147.12274.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 08 June 2009 01:15:42 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > To be perfectly clear on this: > > > > * all patches were posted a week ago to the list (they replaced patches > > from two weeks ago -- which were intended for -rc8 but thanks to feedback > > I found a better way to do it). > > Bartlomiej - if you want to add new features, they should have been posted > on the list BEFORE THE MERGE WINDOW EVEN OPENED. This is not a new feature and basing your opinions on opinions of people who don't read the code before commenting is bad, really bad, m'kay? Anyway I'll revisit the pull request tomorrow.