From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: acpi_pci_unbind should clean up properly after acpi_pci_bind
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:14:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609191457.GF23647@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906050949.02097.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
* Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 05:35:21 pm Alex Chiang wrote:
> > * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> > >
> > > I have a concern about this change.
> > >
> > > The acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() against dev->bus removes not only
> > > the _PRT entries for PCI function corresponding to specified
> > > acpi_device, but also other _PRT entries for working PCI
> > > devices/functions on the same bus. As a result, interrupt
> > > initialization for those PCI functions would no longer work
> > > properly after that.
> > >
> > > So I think we should not call acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() against
> > > dev->bus.
> >
> > Thanks for the review. I agree with you.
>
> I agree that this respun version makes things more the way they were,
> so in that sense, it should do no harm. But I still have the niggling
> concern that .bind() adds _PRT info for non-bridges, and there's no
> corresponding removal. There should be some path that makes this
> more symmetric.
Hm, in another forum, you suggested that dynamic PRT lookups
might be a solution, which I kinda like.
So, the plan that I would prefer is:
a) get this patchset in [and we 'do no harm' here so
_hopefully_ aren't introducing regressions]
b) work on dynamic PRT lookups in a future patchset.
Thanks.
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 5:58 [PATCH v2 00/11] Dynamic ACPI-PCI binding Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ACPI: make acpi_pci_bind() static Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ACPI: Introduce acpi_is_root_bridge() Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ACPI: Introduce acpi_get_pci_dev() Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ACPI: eviscerate pci_bind.c Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() API Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() API Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: acpi_pci_unbind should clean up properly after acpi_pci_bind Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 8:42 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-06-04 23:35 ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-05 15:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-06-05 15:59 ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-09 19:14 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-06-08 3:23 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-06-09 19:09 ` Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] PCI Hotplug: acpiphp: convert to acpi_get_pci_dev Alex Chiang
2009-06-11 21:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-11 22:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-04 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ACPI: kill acpi_get_pci_id Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ACPI: video: convert to acpi_get_pci_dev Alex Chiang
2009-06-04 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ACPI: kill acpi_get_physical_pci_device() Alex Chiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609191457.GF23647@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox