public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Correct some event and umask values for Intel processors
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:36:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610053623.GC30923@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609141621.GA32703@elte.hu>

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 04:16:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Correct some event and UMASK values according to Intel SDM.
> 
> Very nice, thanks!
> 
> were you able to test the Atom ones by any chance?
> 

You bet I was as I'm working on Moblin;-) However, some work while some
do not. I'll take a look at the problematic ones. With the previous
event and umask values, the pmc does not count at all for some events,
like l1d-write-ops.

Btw, one thing I don't quite understand is why you aliased
dtlb-write-ops to l1d-write-ops when setting event and umask values. Are
they the same event?

Thanks
-Yong

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 13:15 [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Correct some event and umask values for Intel processors Yong Wang
2009-06-09 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10  5:36   ` Yong Wang [this message]
2009-06-10 10:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11  8:27       ` Yong Wang
2009-06-11 11:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12  8:15       ` Yong Wang
2009-06-09 14:52 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter, x86: " tip-bot for Yong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090610053623.GC30923@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com \
    --to=yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox