From: William Thompson <wt@electro-mechanical.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel <ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>
Subject: Re: 3com 3crxjk10075 with ath5k driver
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:23:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610112357.GB19203@electro-mechanical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0906091339j3784c36bxe888af16272fbcde@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 04:39:12PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> [CCed ath5k-devel]
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, William
> Thompson<wt@electro-mechanical.com> wrote:
> > This card has the "xjack" antennae which is supposed to disable the radio (I
> > thought it was in hardware, but it's not) when it is not extended. ?The
> > madwifi driver (Last time I actually used this card with it) did disable the
> > radio (Or refused packets, not sure which).
>
> Huh, I wonder how that works. Is disabling the radio an advertised feature?
> i.e. as opposed to just not working because the antenna is in?
I'm not sure if it was advertised that way, but according to 3com's site:
3Com-patented XJACK antenna design extends for use and retracts for safe
transport and to conserve power; no need to remove the PC Card from the
notebook while traveling
Sounds like it was intended that way.
> > The kernel ath5k driver (last tested 2.6.29.4) will work regardless if the
> > antannae is in or out.
>
> I suppose it could be asserting something on rfkill gpios; ath5k hasn't had
> real rfkill support yet. Anyone else know about these devices?
It's possible. The LED on it goes off when it's pushed in. Which reminds
me, I don't think the ath5k driver allows the LED to blink when it's
transmitting/receiving, it just stays on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 19:51 3com 3crxjk10075 with ath5k driver William Thompson
2009-06-09 20:39 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-10 11:23 ` William Thompson [this message]
2009-06-10 11:34 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-10 11:54 ` William Thompson
2009-06-10 12:07 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 15:25 ` William Thompson
2009-06-11 17:41 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 18:33 ` William Thompson
2009-06-11 18:40 ` [ath5k-devel] " Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090610112357.GB19203@electro-mechanical.com \
--to=wt@electro-mechanical.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox