From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760954AbZFJTQ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:16:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756783AbZFJTQt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:16:49 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48470 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752698AbZFJTQt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:16:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:16:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, WANG Cong , Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: 2.6.31 -mm merge plans Message-Id: <20090610121633.d678fc8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090610190841.GT8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20090610115140.09c9f4cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090610190841.GT8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (cc's added) On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:08:41 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:51:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec.patch > > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec-checkpatch-fixes.patch > > I'm not sure that there's any point in that. Sure, we can slap two > files together; what the hell for? Both are quite large, there's > a (relatively) sane separation of code between them (misc. files > contents in /proc// vs. directory structure and symlinks in > there, more or less) and I don't see any benefit in mashing them > together. Up to Alexey, but IMO that's pointless. No strong opinions here. AFAIK Alexey isn't doing procfs any more?