From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760580AbZFJTIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755056AbZFJTIk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:40 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:43103 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbZFJTIj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:08:41 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.31 -mm merge plans Message-ID: <20090610190841.GT8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20090610115140.09c9f4cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090610115140.09c9f4cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:51:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec.patch > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec-checkpatch-fixes.patch I'm not sure that there's any point in that. Sure, we can slap two files together; what the hell for? Both are quite large, there's a (relatively) sane separation of code between them (misc. files contents in /proc// vs. directory structure and symlinks in there, more or less) and I don't see any benefit in mashing them together. Up to Alexey, but IMO that's pointless.